Costa Hirdan Katarina de Medeiros, Sacco Rafael, Leão Lima Clarissa Emanuela, Botão Rodrigo, Galvão Ciro, Passos Gabriela Pantoja, Brito Thiago, Ciola Giancarlo, Melo Dos Santos Marcos Eduardo, Singh Jewellord Nem, Moutinho Dos Santos Edmilson
Institute of Energy and Environment, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Energy Engineering and Electrical Automation, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 28;10(21):e39190. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39190. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
This study offers a comparative analysis of natural gas markets in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and India, spanning from 2000 to 2020. Leveraging panel data and historical time series analysis, coupled with Porter's Five Forces framework, it examines industry dynamics across upstream, downstream, midstream, and upstream dimensions. Insights into competitive landscapes are derived, considering regulatory frameworks, resource availability, infrastructure development, and demand patterns. Despite Brazil's efforts to enhance domestic production, infrastructure, and regulatory reforms, challenges persist, hindering sectoral growth. Comparative studies underscore the need for policy improvements to align with investment commitments. This study contributes novel insights into the competitive positioning of natural gas markets, offering actionable recommendations for stakeholders. Identifying potential bottlenecks informs strict decision-making in the global energy landscape.
本研究对2000年至2020年期间巴西、墨西哥、哥伦比亚、阿根廷和印度的天然气市场进行了比较分析。利用面板数据和历史时间序列分析，并结合波特五力框架，研究了上游、下游、中游和上游维度的行业动态。考虑到监管框架、资源可用性、基础设施发展和需求模式，得出了对竞争格局的见解。尽管巴西努力提高国内产量、改善基础设施并进行监管改革，但挑战依然存在，阻碍了该行业的增长。比较研究强调了政策改进以符合投资承诺的必要性。本研究为天然气市场的竞争定位提供了新颖的见解，为利益相关者提供了可操作的建议。识别潜在瓶颈有助于在全球能源格局中做出严格的决策。
