Weinreich Lior, Metz Gido, Witzel Björn, Hermansson Olga, Dümig Paula, Schulte-Körne Gerd, Moll Kristina
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 5, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 30;10(21):e39968. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39968. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
In recent years, online platforms have made educational, medical, and other professional content easily accessible, but research evaluating such platforms is still scarce. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate LONDI, a German learning disorders platform. The platform offers scientifically based information for different user groups, and an algorithm-based help system that professionals can use to facilitate diagnosing and planning interventions. The evaluation is focused on the user group of learning therapists using the platform and its help system. It is theoretically grounded on the RE-AIM framework and assesses four of its dimensions: Reach, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. Results from an online questionnaire ( = 496) showed that the platform reaches a large proportion of learning therapists. Another online questionnaire ( = 150) revealed that most users say they would adopt the help system, and this is predicted by its pragmatic qualities. Data from the Matomo web analytics software ( = 8,459 online visits) displayed diverse patterns in the platform's implementation. Future research is needed to further examine their meaning in the context of health-related education. Web analytics also revealed that usage patterns are not maintained. Rather, there is an increase in the number of users and in smartphone usage over time, coinciding with a decrease in the average time spent on the platform. Consequently, future efforts will be dedicated to optimizing smartphone compatibility. This study is the first to utilize the RE-AIM framework with web analytics, paving the way for further theory-grounded platform evaluations.
近年来,在线平台使教育、医学及其他专业内容易于获取,但评估此类平台的研究仍然稀缺。本研究的目的是评估德国学习障碍平台LONDI。该平台为不同用户群体提供基于科学的信息,以及一个基于算法的帮助系统,专业人员可利用该系统促进诊断和规划干预措施。评估聚焦于使用该平台及其帮助系统的学习治疗师用户群体。它在理论上以RE-AIM框架为基础,评估其四个维度:覆盖范围、采用情况、实施情况和维持情况。一份在线问卷(n = 496)的结果显示,该平台覆盖了很大比例的学习治疗师。另一份在线问卷(n = 150)显示,大多数用户表示他们会采用该帮助系统,这可由其实用性特质预测。Matomo网络分析软件的数据(n = 8459次在线访问)显示了该平台实施过程中的不同模式。未来需要进一步研究它们在健康相关教育背景下的意义。网络分析还显示使用模式没有得到维持。相反,随着时间的推移,用户数量和智能手机使用量有所增加,同时在该平台上花费的平均时间减少。因此,未来将致力于优化智能手机兼容性。本研究首次将RE-AIM框架与网络分析结合使用,为进一步基于理论的平台评估铺平了道路。