Solmell Oscar, Sunnergren Ola, Qureshi Abdul Rashid, Alinasab Babak
ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ear, Nose & Throat Clinic, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024 Dec;17(4):NP68-NP76. doi: 10.1177/19433875241250225. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
Retrospective cohort study.
Frontal sinus fractures (FSFs) can lead to a range of clinical challenges, including facial deformity, impaired facial sensation, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, sinus drainage impairment, chronic sinus pain and mucocele formation. The optimal management approach, whether surgical or conservative, remains a topic of ongoing discussion. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the functional and esthetic outcomes of patients with surgically and conservatively treated FSFs.
In this retrospective study, patients treated for FSFs at the Karolinska university hospital 2004 to 2020 were identified in hospital records and invited to participate in a long-term follow-up. Sequelae and satisfaction with the esthetic result were assessed trough questionnaires and physical examinations.
A total of 93 patients were included in the study, with 49 presenting isolated anterior wall fractures and 44 presenting combined anterior and posterior wall fractures. Surgical intervention was performed in 45 cases, while 48 were managed conservatively. Among patients with moderate anterior wall fractures (4-6 mm dislocation), 80% of surgically treated patients compared to 100% of conservatively treated patients expressed satisfaction with their cosmetic outcomes at follow-up ( = .03). In conservatively treated patients with a forehead impression, the anterior wall fracture dislocation ranged from 5.3 to 6.0 mm ( < .0001). Approximately 50% of surgically treated patients vs 15% of conservatively treated patients developed impaired forehead sensation at follow-up ( = .03). Thirty-six percent of surgically treated patients reported dissatisfaction with surgery-related scarring, particularly those who underwent surgery via laceration or bicoronal incision.
This study suggests that anterior FSFs with a dislocation of 5 mm or less can be effectively managed conservatively with high patient satisfaction, low risk of long-term forehead sensation impairment and without potential development of forehead impression. Bicoronal incision or incision via a laceration may be associated with esthetic dissatisfaction and late sequelae such as alopecia.
回顾性队列研究。
额窦骨折(FSF)可导致一系列临床挑战,包括面部畸形、面部感觉受损、脑脊液(CSF)漏、鼻窦引流障碍、慢性鼻窦疼痛和黏液囊肿形成。最佳治疗方法,无论是手术治疗还是保守治疗,仍然是一个持续讨论的话题。本研究的目的是评估和比较手术治疗和保守治疗FSF患者的功能和美学效果。
在这项回顾性研究中,通过医院记录确定了2004年至2020年在卡罗林斯卡大学医院接受FSF治疗的患者,并邀请他们参加长期随访。通过问卷调查和体格检查评估后遗症和对美学结果的满意度。
本研究共纳入93例患者,其中49例为单纯前壁骨折,44例为前壁和后壁联合骨折。45例患者接受了手术干预,48例接受了保守治疗。在中度前壁骨折(4-6毫米移位)患者中,80%接受手术治疗的患者与100%接受保守治疗的患者在随访时对其美容效果表示满意(P = 0.03)。在保守治疗有前额凹陷的患者中,前壁骨折移位范围为5.3至6.0毫米(P < 0.0001)。约50%接受手术治疗的患者与15%接受保守治疗的患者在随访时出现前额感觉受损(P = 0.03)。36%接受手术治疗的患者报告对手术相关疤痕不满意,尤其是那些通过撕裂伤或双冠状切口进行手术的患者。
本研究表明,移位5毫米或以下的前FSF可以通过保守治疗有效管理,患者满意度高,长期前额感觉受损风险低,且不会出现前额凹陷。双冠状切口或通过撕裂伤切口可能与美学不满意和脱发等晚期后遗症有关。