Meng Shengnan, Cao Yanling, Shen Qingwei, Dong Ling, Wang Nan
Department of Gynecology, Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Qiqihar, Qiqihar, China.
Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 1;11:1492469. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1492469. eCollection 2024.
This study was to analyze the dynamics of tissue damage and inflammatory response markers perioperatively and whether these differ between robotic laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in early endometrial cancer.
In a randomized controlled trial conducted at SHANGHAI FIRST MATERNITY and INFANT HOSPITAL, eighty women with early-stage, low-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to receive either robotic or conventional laparoscopy. Blood samples were collected at admission, immediately before surgery, 2 h after surgery, 24 h after surgery, 48 h after surgery, and 1 week after surgery. The samples were analyzed for various biomarkers associated with inflammatory processes and tissue damage. These included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count, interleukin-6 (IL-6), cortisol, creatine kinase (CK), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-). These markers provide insights into the underlying physiological responses and potential tissue-level changes within the study participants.
There was no significant difference in clinical and preoperative data between two groups. The results showed that the patients who underwent robotic laparoscopy had a longer pre-surgical time compared to the conventional laparoscopy group. However, the robotic group had shorter operating times, quicker vaginal cuff closures, and lower estimated blood loss compared to the conventional laparoscopy group. The hospital stays, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and drainage volume on the first day after operation were lower in robotic group compared to conventional laparoscopy group. hs-CRP, WBC, IL-6 and cortisol were significantly lower in the robotic group, though the differences were transient.
This study demonstrated that robotic laparoscopy, used in early endometrial cancer treatment, leads to a reduced inflammatory response, less tissue damage, and lower stress levels, as evidenced by decreased levels of hs-CRP, IL-6, and cortisol, compared to conventional laparoscopy. These findings suggest that robot- laparoscopy may facilitate a quicker recovery and improve patient-reported outcomes.
本研究旨在分析早期子宫内膜癌患者围手术期组织损伤和炎症反应标志物的动态变化,以及机器人腹腔镜手术和传统腹腔镜手术之间这些指标是否存在差异。
在上海第一妇婴保健院进行的一项随机对照试验中,80例早期、低风险子宫内膜癌女性被随机分配接受机器人腹腔镜手术或传统腹腔镜手术。在入院时、手术前即刻、术后2小时、术后24小时、术后48小时和术后1周采集血样。对样本进行分析,检测与炎症过程和组织损伤相关的各种生物标志物。这些标志物包括高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞计数(WBC)、血小板计数、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、皮质醇、肌酸激酶(CK)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-)。这些标志物有助于深入了解研究参与者潜在的生理反应和可能的组织水平变化。
两组的临床和术前数据无显著差异。结果显示,与传统腹腔镜手术组相比,接受机器人腹腔镜手术的患者术前时间更长。然而,与传统腹腔镜手术组相比,机器人手术组的手术时间更短,阴道残端闭合更快,估计失血量更低。机器人手术组的住院时间、术后第一天的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和引流量均低于传统腹腔镜手术组。机器人手术组的hs-CRP、WBC、IL-6和皮质醇水平显著较低,尽管差异是短暂的。
本研究表明,用于早期子宫内膜癌治疗的机器人腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术相比,炎症反应减轻、组织损伤减少、应激水平降低,hs-CRP、IL-6和皮质醇水平降低证明了这一点。这些发现表明,机器人腹腔镜手术可能有助于更快康复并改善患者报告的结局。