• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与学生对床边教学的看法:一项描述性研究。

Patients' & students' perspectives on bedside teaching: A descriptive study.

作者信息

Malik Farhat Rehana, Khan Farzeen

机构信息

Dr. Farhat Rehana Malik, MBBS, MPH, CHPE, PGD. Department of Community Health Sciences, Peshawar Medical College, Warsak Road, Peshawar, Paksitan. Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Dr. Farzeen Khan, BDS, MPH, M.Sc. Department of Community Dentistry, Peshawar Dental College, Warsak Road, Peshawar, Pakistan. Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Nov;40(10):2384-2389. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.10.8743.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.10.8743
PMID:39554675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11568696/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the student's and patients' perspectives about bedside teaching and to identify possible barriers that delay effective bedside teaching.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at two teaching hospitals in Peshawar with 153 participants through non-probability serial sampling from December 2017 to March 2018. Interview-based validated questionnaires were used and pilot tested as well. Ethical approval was taken with the participant's consent. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 19.0 using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Among the total 79 students, all of them completed the questionnaires with a 100% response rate. However, from the 76 patients only 74 responded with a response rate of 97%. The majority of the patients (n=58; 78%) were satisfied with bedside teaching with no problems faced. During the bedside teaching only (n= 13; 18.2%) felt anxious while others, enjoyed (n= 59; 80.5%) with satisfaction and only 13% (n= 10) thought their privacy was breached. The satisfied students with the time spent on bedside teaching were (n= 52; 65.5%) while (n= 30; 38.7%) thought thirty minutes time was not enough. The hurdles faced were lack of practice (37.3%), fear of embarrassment in front of peers (21.3%), and lack of confidence to approach the patient (16%).

CONCLUSION

The patients showed positive attitude and enjoyed bedside teaching. The students preferred it as a valuable tool for clinical experience. However, time constraints, lack of practice, lack of confidence, confidentiality, and anxiety must be overcome to make bedside teaching a useful method. Effective teaching still requires good teaching methodologies with confidence and competency.

摘要

目的

评估学生和患者对床边教学的看法,并找出可能延迟有效床边教学的障碍。

方法

本横断面研究于2017年12月至2018年3月在白沙瓦的两家教学医院进行,通过非概率连续抽样选取了153名参与者。使用基于访谈的经过验证的问卷,并进行了预测试。在获得参与者同意后获得了伦理批准。使用SPSS 19.0版进行描述性统计分析数据。

结果

在总共79名学生中,所有人都完成了问卷,回复率为100%。然而,在76名患者中,只有74人回复,回复率为97%。大多数患者(n = 58;78%)对床边教学感到满意,没有遇到问题。在床边教学期间,只有13人(18.2%)感到焦虑,而其他人则很享受(n = 59;80.5%),只有13%(n = 10)认为他们的隐私被侵犯。对床边教学时间感到满意的学生有52人(65.5%),而30人(38.7%)认为30分钟时间不够。面临的障碍包括缺乏实践(37.3%)、害怕在同龄人面前尴尬(21.3%)以及缺乏与患者接触的信心(16%)。

结论

患者表现出积极的态度,享受床边教学。学生们将其视为临床经验的宝贵工具。然而,必须克服时间限制、缺乏实践、缺乏信心、保密性和焦虑等问题,才能使床边教学成为一种有用的方法。有效的教学仍然需要有信心和能力的良好教学方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55eb/11568696/75f6591ad36f/PJMS-40-2384-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55eb/11568696/62b0af8f01ea/PJMS-40-2384-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55eb/11568696/75f6591ad36f/PJMS-40-2384-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55eb/11568696/62b0af8f01ea/PJMS-40-2384-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55eb/11568696/75f6591ad36f/PJMS-40-2384-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' & students' perspectives on bedside teaching: A descriptive study.患者与学生对床边教学的看法:一项描述性研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Nov;40(10):2384-2389. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.10.8743.
2
Bedside manners: do we care?床边礼仪:我们在意吗?
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2013 Jan-Jun;25(1-2):179-82.
3
Patient outlook on bedside teaching in a medical school.医学院校学生对床边教学的看法
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Nov 3;16(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.10.002. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Perceptions of Medical Students About Bedside Teaching in a Medical School.医学院学生对医学院校床边教学的看法
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018 Mar-Apr;56(211):640-645.
5
Obstetrics and gynecology patients' perceptions about bedside teaching at a Saudi teaching hospital.沙特一家教学医院妇产科患者对床边教学的看法。
J Family Community Med. 2024 Apr-Jun;31(2):168-175. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_229_23. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
6
An Alternative to Traditional Bedside Teaching During COVID-19: High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Study.COVID-19 期间传统床边教学的替代方案:基于高保真模拟的研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 May 9;8(2):e33565. doi: 10.2196/33565.
7
Patient Satisfaction with Bedside Teaching Rounds Compared with Nonbedside Rounds.与非床边查房相比,患者对床边教学查房的满意度。
South Med J. 2016 Feb;109(2):112-5. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000419.
8
Students' perspective of bedside teaching: A qualitative study.学生对床边教学的看法:一项定性研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):351-5. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9194.
9
Perceived Learning and Feedback of Students Following the Competency-based Clinical Rotation in Psychiatry: A Retrospective Review From Tertiary-care Teaching Institute in Central India.印度中部三级护理教学机构对精神科基于胜任力的临床轮转学生的感知学习与反馈:一项回顾性研究
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Sep;46(5):429-438. doi: 10.1177/02537176241277518. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
10
Bed side teaching: Student's perception and its correlation with academic performance.床边教学:学生的认知及其与学业成绩的相关性。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Sep-Oct;36(6):1204-1209. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.6.2120.

本文引用的文献

1
Bedside Teaching in Neurology.神经病学床边教学
Semin Neurol. 2018 Aug;38(4):441-448. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666984. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
2
Students' perspective of bedside teaching: A qualitative study.学生对床边教学的看法:一项定性研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):351-5. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9194.
3
Medical students' perceptions of bedside teaching.医学生对床边教学的看法。
Clin Teach. 2017 Jun;14(3):205-210. doi: 10.1111/tct.12532. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
Bedside teaching-making it an effective instructional tool.床边教学——使其成为一种有效的教学工具。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014 Jul-Sep;26(3):286-9.
5
Bedside teaching in medical education: a literature review.床边教学在医学教育中的应用:文献综述。
Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Apr;3(2):76-88. doi: 10.1007/s40037-013-0083-y.
6
The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study.学习者对内科查房的看法:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jul 9;10:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-53.
7
Medical student and patient perspectives on bedside teaching.医学生和患者对床边教学的看法。
Saudi Med J. 2010 May;31(5):565-8.
8
Quantification of bedside teaching by an academic hospitalist group.学术医院医生团队对床边教学的量化评估
J Hosp Med. 2009 May;4(5):304-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.540.
9
Domains of effective teaching process students perspectives in two medical schools.两所医学院校学生视角下有效教学过程的领域
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):e125-30. doi: 10.1080/01421590802572742.
10
Improving bedside teaching: findings from a focus group study of learners.改善床边教学:对学习者进行焦点小组研究的结果
Acad Med. 2008 Mar;83(3):257-64. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181637f3e.