van den Berg Dennis J, Kiers Henri, Maas Esther T, Vliet Vlieland Thea P M, Ostelo Raymond W J G
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Institute for Movement Studies, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Physiother. 2024 Nov 3:1-7. doi: 10.1080/21679169.2024.2421821.
To explore the frequency of administration and the usage of the Hip Disability and Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS/KOOS) and their Physical function Short forms (HOOS-PS/KOOS-PS) by physiotherapists after total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA/TKA).
A cross-sectional study using an open online survey.
Primary care physiotherapy practices affiliated with the Dutch Association for Quality in Physiotherapy.
Physiotherapists with experience treating over five patients with a THA or TKA within the past 5 years.
One hundred and sixty-six physiotherapists completed the survey (median age: 40.0 years, female: 34%, median experience: 15.0 years). Of those, 32 did not administer the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS) ('non-users'), 41 administered only due to organisational requirements or guideline recommendations ('passive users') and 93 actively used them for individual patient treatment purposes ('active users'). 'Treatment evaluation', 'diagnosis', and 'prognosis' were most often reported as potential reasons to actively use the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS) for individual treatment purposes. Determinants associated with active use of the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS) appeared to be fewer years of experience as a physiotherapist, a larger treatment volume of THA/TKA, a younger age, and higher attitude scores regarding PROM use.
Most responding physiotherapists administer the HOOS(-PS) or KOOS(-PS), but their use for individual treatment is limited. Active users appear to be less experienced, younger, treat larger volumes of THA/TKA, and possess a more positive attitude towards using patient-reported outcome measures.
探讨全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)后物理治疗师使用髋关节功能障碍与膝关节损伤骨关节炎疗效评分(HOOS/KOOS)及其身体功能简表(HOOS - PS/KOOS - PS)的频率和使用情况。
采用开放式在线调查的横断面研究。
隶属于荷兰物理治疗质量协会的基层医疗物理治疗机构。
在过去5年内有治疗超过5例THA或TKA患者经验的物理治疗师。
166名物理治疗师完成了调查(中位年龄:40.0岁,女性:34%,中位经验:15.0年)。其中,32人未使用HOOS(-PS)或KOOS(-PS)(“非使用者”),41人仅因组织要求或指南建议而使用(“被动使用者”),93人出于个体患者治疗目的而积极使用(“主动使用者”)。“治疗评估”“诊断”和“预后”最常被报告为出于个体治疗目的而积极使用HOOS(-PS)或KOOS(-PS)的潜在原因。与积极使用HOOS(-PS)或KOOS(-PS)相关的决定因素似乎是作为物理治疗师的经验年限较少、THA/TKA的治疗量较大、年龄较小以及对使用患者报告结局指标的态度得分较高。
大多数回复的物理治疗师使用HOOS(-PS)或KOOS(-PS),但用于个体治疗的情况有限。主动使用者似乎经验较少、年龄较小、治疗的THA/TKA患者数量较多,并且对使用患者报告结局指标持更积极的态度。