• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业科学中用于方差分析的统计数据转换:系统评价。

Statistical data transformation in agrarian sciences for variance analysis: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Federal University of Vicosa, Viçosa, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Department of General Biology, Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Viçosa, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2024 Jul 12;13:459. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.144805.2. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.144805.2
PMID:39555384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11564925/
Abstract

In statistical analyses, a common practice for enhancing the validity of variance analysis is the application of data transformation to convert measurements into a different mathematical scale. This technique was first employed in 1898 by Edgeworth and remains relevant in current scientific publications despite the proliferation of more modern and advanced techniques that obviate the need for certain assumptions. Data transformations, when appropriately used, can make the model error terms approximate a normal distribution. It is also possible to use the technique to correct the heterogeneity of variances or to render an additive model, ensuring the validity of the analysis of variances. Given that this technique can be hastily applied, potentially leading to erroneous or invalid results, we conducted a systematic literature review of studies in the field of agrarian sciences that utilized data transformations for the validation of analysis of variances. The aim was to check the transformations employed by the scientific community, the motivation behind their use, and to identify possible errors and inconsistencies in applying the technique in publications. In this study, we identified shortcomings and misconceptions associated with using this method, and we observed incomplete and inadequate utilization of the technique in of the analysed sample, resulting in misguided and erroneous conclusions in scientific research outcomes.

摘要

在统计分析中,增强方差分析有效性的常用方法是应用数据转换,将测量值转换为不同的数学尺度。这一技术最早由 Edgeworth 于 1898 年提出,尽管目前有更多现代和先进的技术可以避免某些假设,但它在当前的科学出版物中仍然具有重要意义。适当使用数据转换可以使模型误差项近似正态分布。也可以使用该技术来纠正方差的异质性或使加性模型生效,从而确保方差分析的有效性。由于该技术可能被仓促应用,从而导致错误或无效的结果,因此我们对农业科学领域中利用数据转换验证方差分析的研究进行了系统的文献回顾。目的是检查科学界使用的转换方法、使用它们的动机,并确定在出版物中应用该技术可能存在的错误和不一致之处。在这项研究中,我们发现了与使用该方法相关的缺点和误解,并观察到分析样本中存在数据转换方法使用不完整和不充分的情况,导致科学研究结果产生误导性和错误性的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13f0/11565129/3731954f3bd9/f1000research-13-168986-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13f0/11565129/19a4c6fa093a/f1000research-13-168986-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13f0/11565129/dc60c83a72ea/f1000research-13-168986-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13f0/11565129/3731954f3bd9/f1000research-13-168986-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13f0/11565129/19a4c6fa093a/f1000research-13-168986-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13f0/11565129/dc60c83a72ea/f1000research-13-168986-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13f0/11565129/3731954f3bd9/f1000research-13-168986-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Statistical data transformation in agrarian sciences for variance analysis: a systematic review.农业科学中用于方差分析的统计数据转换:系统评价。
F1000Res. 2024 Jul 12;13:459. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.144805.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
4
Impact of Euro-Canadian agrarian practices: in search of sustainable import-substitution strategies to enhance food security in subarctic Ontario, Canada.欧裔加拿大人农业实践的影响:探寻可持续的进口替代战略以增强加拿大安大略省亚北极地区的粮食安全
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Apr-Jun;13(2):2211. Epub 2013 May 8.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
7
On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.关于方差未知且可能不相等时2×2固定效应方差分析的样本量计算。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 May;62(Pt 2):417-25. doi: 10.1348/000711008X322853. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
8
Analysis of a genetically structured variance heterogeneity model using the Box-Cox transformation.使用Box-Cox变换对遗传结构方差异质性模型进行分析。
Genet Res (Camb). 2011 Feb;93(1):33-46. doi: 10.1017/S0016672310000418. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
9
Technical note: Application of the Box-Cox data transformation to animal science experiments.技术说明:Box-Cox数据变换在动物科学实验中的应用。
J Anim Sci. 1998 Mar;76(3):847-9. doi: 10.2527/1998.763847x.
10
Translational Metabolomics of Head Injury: Exploring Dysfunctional Cerebral Metabolism with Ex Vivo NMR Spectroscopy-Based Metabolite Quantification头部损伤的转化代谢组学:基于体外核磁共振波谱的代谢物定量分析探索脑代谢功能障碍

本文引用的文献

1
Count data in biology-Data transformation or model reformation?生物学中的计数数据——数据转换还是模型重构?
Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb 16;8(6):3077-3085. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3807. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
The use of transformations.变换的使用。
Biometrics. 1947 Mar;3(1):39-52.
3
Some consequences when the assumptions for the analysis of variance are not satisfied.当方差分析的假设不满足时的一些后果。
Biometrics. 1947 Mar;3(1):22-38.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.