School of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0313682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313682. eCollection 2024.
Supplier concentration (SUC) has disadvantage of vulnerability along with cost savings and efficiency. While current scholarship focus on the vulnerability of firms with centralized suppliers during the COVID-19 epidemic, there is no empirical study that explores the impact of post-disaster SUC on firm value as countries removing regional isolation policy. I focus on the impact of COVID-19 reopening policy on investor attitudes towards SUC after the resolution of a supply chain disruption crisis. I try to examine whether investors still perceive SUC as a risk signal or as a positive signal for rapid recovery. Using the event shock of China's reopening announcement and data on A-share listed companies, I find that SUC has a positive impact on cumulative abnormal returns at reopening. I also find that positive effect of SUC is more prominent for firms that benefit from a larger reduction in transaction costs due to the reopening policy. I also analyze the moderating effect and find that information intermediaries such as analysts and media attention amplify the positive effects of SUC. My research provides new perspective on achieving post-disaster value enhancement through SUC.
供应商集中(SUC)具有脆弱性的缺点,同时也具有成本节约和效率提高的优点。虽然现有学术研究关注在 COVID-19 疫情期间集中供应商的企业的脆弱性,但没有实证研究探讨灾后 SUC 对企业价值的影响,因为各国正在取消区域隔离政策。我关注的是 COVID-19 重启政策对供应链中断危机解决后投资者对 SUC 的态度的影响。我试图检验投资者是否仍然将 SUC 视为风险信号,还是视为快速复苏的积极信号。利用中国重启公告的事件冲击和 A 股上市公司的数据,我发现 SUC 对重启时的累计异常收益有正向影响。我还发现,对于因重启政策而受益于交易成本大幅降低的企业,SUC 的积极影响更为显著。我还分析了调节效应,并发现分析师和媒体关注度等信息中介放大了 SUC 的积极效应。我的研究为通过 SUC 实现灾后价值提升提供了新视角。