Zhang Zhizhao, Wang Yahui, Zhao Jing, Liu Lei, Ran Pancen, Shu Yang, Xu Wei, Fu Guobin
Department of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
College of Clinical Medicine, Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan, China.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2025;186(6):594-605. doi: 10.1159/000542281. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
COVID-19 has emerged as a significant worldwide health crisis in recent years, characterized by elevated morbidity and mortality rates. COVID-19 vaccinations can diminish transmission and safeguard people. The evaluation of immunogenicity and safety in high-risk populations, such as lung cancer patients, continues to provide a problem. This evaluation seeks to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccinations in patients with lung cancer.
A search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from January 2021 to November 2022 utilizing the keywords: COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 AND COVID-19 vaccination AND lung cancer OR lung carcinoma. The subsequent requirements must be satisfied for inclusion: (1) research involving at least 30 lung cancer patients undergoing active antitumor therapy alongside healthy controls; (2) COVID-19 vaccination; (3) observational studies (either prospective or retrospective) and clinical trials featuring healthy controls; (4) the primary outcome measured was anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike IgG titers following the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in lung cancer patients. Secondary results included local and systemic adverse responses following the first and second doses. Antibody titers (mean ± standard deviation) were assessed for each study individually. The occurrence of adverse events following the first and second dosages was recorded.
Eight studies were included, comprising 1,220 lung cancer patients and 599 healthy persons. IgG titers against the SARS-CoV-2-spike protein were markedly reduced in lung cancer patients compared to healthy controls, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.002). The safety profiles of lung cancer patients and healthy individuals were comparable: local reaction after the first vaccine: relative risk (RR) = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.68-1.19; systemic reaction after the first vaccine: RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.51-1.66; local reaction after the second vaccine: RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.54-1.19; systemic reaction after the second vaccine: RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.65-2.21.
The antibody titer in lung cancer patients is markedly lower than that in the healthy group. Consequently, fatalities from COVID-19 may transpire in these people notwithstanding vaccination. Consequently, comprehensive protective measures must continue to be implemented to safeguard lung cancer patients who have received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccination against COVID-19.
近年来,新冠病毒病已成为一场重大的全球健康危机,其特点是发病率和死亡率不断上升。新冠病毒病疫苗接种可以减少传播并保护人们。对肺癌患者等高风险人群的免疫原性和安全性评估仍然存在问题。本评估旨在评估肺癌患者接种新冠病毒病疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。
于2021年1月至2022年11月在PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science中进行检索,使用的关键词为:新冠病毒病或严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2以及新冠病毒病疫苗接种和肺癌或支气管肺癌。纳入研究必须满足以下要求:(1)涉及至少30名正在接受积极抗肿瘤治疗的肺癌患者并设健康对照的研究;(2)新冠病毒病疫苗接种;(3)观察性研究(前瞻性或回顾性)以及设有健康对照的临床试验;(4)主要测量指标为肺癌患者接种第二剂新冠病毒病疫苗后的抗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2刺突免疫球蛋白G滴度。次要结果包括接种第一剂和第二剂后的局部和全身不良反应。对每项研究分别评估抗体滴度(平均值±标准差)。记录接种第一剂和第二剂后不良事件的发生情况。
纳入8项研究,包括1220名肺癌患者和599名健康人。与健康对照相比,肺癌患者针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2刺突蛋白的免疫球蛋白G滴度明显降低,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.002)。肺癌患者和健康个体的安全性概况具有可比性:接种第一剂疫苗后的局部反应:相对危险度(RR)= 0.90,95%置信区间(CI):0.68 - 1.19;接种第一剂疫苗后的全身反应:RR = 0.92,95% CI:0.51 - 1.66;接种第二剂疫苗后的局部反应:RR = 0.81,95% CI:0.54 - 1.19;接种第二剂疫苗后的全身反应:RR = 1.20,95% CI:0.65 - 2.21。
肺癌患者的抗体滴度明显低于健康组。因此,尽管接种了疫苗,这些人仍可能死于新冠病毒病。因此,必须继续实施全面的防护措施,以保护已接种两剂新冠病毒病疫苗的肺癌患者免受新冠病毒病侵害。