Mirza Mansoor Raza, Lorusso Domenica, Shen Qin, Allonby Odette, Slim Mahmoud, Borkowska Katarzyna, Betts Marissa, Coleman Robert L
Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital & Nordic Society of Gynaecologic Oncology Clinical Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Humanitas San Pio X, Milan, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2025 Feb;206:104555. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104555. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
Novel therapies are driving meaningful changes to the management of endometrial cancer (EC). Herein, a systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced/recurrent EC. Searches were conducted using multiple databases through October 26, 2023. In total, 108 records of 57 unique trials (48 of first-line therapies) met the inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics varied by study, and sample sizes ranged from 28 to 1328. Median progression-free survival was reported in 28 trials (range, 1.9-18.8 months), median overall survival in 26 trials with mature data (range, 6.9-41 months), and safety in 21 trials evaluating first-line systemic therapy ± maintenance. The potentially high risk of adverse events may outweigh the suboptimal efficacy benefits reported for conventional chemotherapy or hormonal therapies. The safety and efficacy of immunotherapies identified within are expected to contribute to a paradigm shift in the management of primary advanced/recurrent EC.
新型疗法正在推动子宫内膜癌(EC)治疗方式发生有意义的变革。在此,我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以评估晚期/复发性EC一线治疗的疗效和安全性。检索工作通过多个数据库进行,截至2023年10月26日。总共,57项独特试验中的108条记录(48项一线治疗试验)符合纳入标准。各研究的基线特征各不相同,样本量从28例到1328例不等。28项试验报告了无进展生存期的中位数(范围为1.9 - 18.8个月);26项有成熟数据的试验报告了总生存期的中位数(范围为6.9 - 41个月);21项评估一线全身治疗±维持治疗的试验报告了安全性。不良事件的潜在高风险可能超过传统化疗或激素疗法所报告的次优疗效益处。本文中确定的免疫疗法的安全性和疗效有望推动原发性晚期/复发性EC治疗模式的转变。