Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Queen's Hospital Burton, Burton on Trent, UK.
Department of General Surgery, Wye Valley NHS Trust, Hereford County Hospital, Hereford, UK.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Nov 18;39(1):184. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04759-9.
Recent studies have suggested that ambulatory management is feasible for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD); however, there is still no consensus regarding the most appropriate management settings. This study presents a multi-centre experience of managing patients presenting with AUD, specifically focusing on clinical outcomes and comparing ambulatory treatment with in-patient management.
A retrospective multi-centre study was conducted across four hospitals in the UK and included all adult patients with computed tomography (CT) confirmed (Hinchey grade 1a) acute diverticulitis over a 12-month period (January - December 2022). Patient medical records were followed up for 1-year post-index episode, and outcomes were compared between those treated through the ambulatory pathway versus inpatient treatment using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). All statistical analysis was performed using the R Foundation for Statistical Computing, version 4.4.
A total of 348 patients with Hinchey 1a acute diverticulitis were included (260 in-patients; 88 ambulatory pathway), of which nearly a third (31.3%) had a recurrent disease. Inpatient management was dominant (74.7%), with a median of 3 days of hospital stay. PSM resulted in 172 patients equally divided between the two care settings. Ambulatory management was associated with a lower readmission rate (P = 0.02 before PSM, P = 0.08 after PSM), comparable surgical (P = 0.57 before PSM, 0% in both groups after PSM) and radiological interventions (P = 0.99 before and after PSM) within one year. In both matched and non-matched groups, a strong association between readmissions and inpatient management was noted in univariate analysis (P = 0.03 before PSM, P = 0.04 after PSM) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.02 before PSM, P = 0.03 after PSM).
Our study supports the safety and efficacy of managing patients with AUD through a well-designed ambulatory care pathway. In particular, hospital re-admission rates are lower and other outcomes are non-inferior to in-patient treatment. This has implications for substantial cost-savings and better utilisation of limited healthcare resources.
最近的研究表明,对于急性单纯性憩室炎(AUD),门诊管理是可行的;然而,对于最合适的管理环境仍没有共识。本研究介绍了一项在英国四家医院进行的多中心管理 AUD 患者的经验,特别关注临床结局,并比较了门诊治疗与住院管理。
对英国四家医院在 12 个月期间(2022 年 1 月至 12 月)接受计算机断层扫描(CT)证实的(Hinchey 1a)急性憩室炎的所有成年患者进行了回顾性多中心研究。对索引发作后 1 年的患者医疗记录进行了随访,并使用 1:1 倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较了通过门诊途径治疗的患者与住院治疗的患者的结局。所有统计分析均使用 R 基金会的统计计算软件,版本 4.4。
共纳入 348 例 Hinchey 1a 急性憩室炎患者(260 例住院患者;88 例门诊患者),其中近三分之一(31.3%)患者出现复发性疾病。住院治疗占主导地位(74.7%),中位住院时间为 3 天。PSM 后两组患者各 172 例。门诊管理与较低的再入院率相关(PSM 前 P=0.02,PSM 后 P=0.08),在 1 年内,手术(PSM 前 P=0.57,两组均无 PSM)和放射学干预(PSM 前 P=0.99,PSM 后 P=0.99)相似。在匹配和非匹配组中,单变量分析(PSM 前 P=0.03,PSM 后 P=0.04)和多变量分析(PSM 前 P=0.02,PSM 后 P=0.03)均显示再入院与住院治疗之间存在强烈关联。
我们的研究支持通过精心设计的门诊护理途径管理 AUD 患者的安全性和有效性。特别是,住院再入院率较低,其他结局与住院治疗相当。这对节省大量成本和更好地利用有限的医疗资源具有重要意义。