• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜择期乙状结肠切除术与憩室炎保守治疗后生活质量和复发结局:LASER 随机临床试验的预先指定的 2 年分析。

Quality-of-Life and Recurrence Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection vs Conservative Treatment Following Diverticulitis: Prespecified 2-Year Analysis of the LASER Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Surgery, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2023 Jun 1;158(6):593-601. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0466.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0466
PMID:37074706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10116381/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Both elective sigmoid resection and conservative treatment are options for patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis; understanding outcomes following each can help inform decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of elective sigmoid resection and conservative treatment for patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis at 2-year follow-up.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter parallel open-label individually randomized clinical trial comparing elective sigmoid resection to conservative treatment in patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis was carried out in 5 Finnish hospitals between September 2014 and October 2018. Follow-up up to 2 years is reported. Of 85 patients randomized and included, 75 and 70 were available for QOL outcomes at 1 year and 2 years, respectively, and 79 and 78 were available for the recurrence outcome at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The present analysis was conducted from September 2015 to June 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic elective sigmoid resection vs conservative treatment (patient education and fiber supplementation).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prespecified secondary outcomes included Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score, complications, and recurrences within 2 years.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (28 male [31%]; mean [SD] age, 54.11 [11.9] years and 62 female [69%]; mean [SD] age, 57.13 [7.6] years) were randomized either to elective sigmoid resection or conservative treatment. After exclusions, 41 patients in the surgery group and 44 in the conservative group were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Eight patients (18%) in the conservative treatment group underwent sigmoid resection within 2 years. The mean GIQLI score at 1 year was 9.51 points higher in the surgery group compared to the conservative group (mean [SD], 118.54 [17.95] vs 109.03 [19.32]; 95% CI, 0.83-18.18; P = .03), while the mean GIQLI score at 2 years was similar between the groups. Within 2 years, 25 of 41 patients in the conservative group (61%) had recurrent diverticulitis compared to 4 of 37 patients in the surgery group (11%). Four of 41 patients in the surgery group (10%) and 2 of 44 in the conservative group (5%) had major postoperative complications within 2 years. In per-protocol analyses, the mean (SD) GIQLI score was higher in the surgery group compared to the conservative treatment group by 11.27 points at 12 months (119.42 [17.98] vs 108.15 [19.28]; 95% CI, 2.24-20.29; P = .02) and 10.43 points at 24 months (117.24 [15.51] vs 106.82 [18.94]; 95% CI, 1.52-19.33; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, elective sigmoid resection was effective in preventing recurrent diverticulitis and improved quality of life over conservative treatment within 2 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02174926.

摘要

重要性

对于复发性、复杂性或持续性疼痛性憩室炎患者,选择性乙状结肠切除术和保守治疗都是选择;了解每种治疗方法的结果有助于做出决策。

目的

比较复发性、复杂性或持续性疼痛性憩室炎患者接受选择性乙状结肠切除术和保守治疗的 2 年随访结果。

设计、地点和参与者:这项多中心平行开放标签个体随机临床试验比较了复发性、复杂性或持续性疼痛性憩室炎患者接受选择性乙状结肠切除术和保守治疗的结果,在芬兰的 5 家医院进行,时间为 2014 年 9 月至 2018 年 10 月。报告了 2 年的随访结果。85 名随机患者中,75 名和 70 名分别在 1 年和 2 年时可获得生活质量结局,79 名和 78 名分别在 1 年和 2 年时可获得复发结局。本分析于 2015 年 9 月至 2022 年 6 月进行。

干预措施

腹腔镜下选择性乙状结肠切除术与保守治疗(患者教育和纤维补充)。

主要结局和测量指标

预先指定的次要结局包括胃肠道生活质量指数(GIQLI)评分、并发症和 2 年内复发。

结果

90 名患者(28 名男性[31%];平均[标准差]年龄为 54.11 [11.9]岁和 62 名女性[69%];平均[标准差]年龄为 57.13 [7.6]岁)被随机分为乙状结肠切除术组或保守治疗组。排除后,手术组 41 例,保守治疗组 44 例纳入意向治疗分析。保守治疗组中有 8 例(18%)患者在 2 年内接受了乙状结肠切除术。与保守治疗组相比,手术组的平均 GIQLI 评分在 1 年时高 9.51 分(平均值[标准差],118.54 [17.95] vs 109.03 [19.32];95%置信区间,0.83-18.18;P=0.03),而 2 年时两组的平均 GIQLI 评分相似。在 2 年内,保守治疗组 41 例中有 25 例(61%)发生复发性憩室炎,手术组 37 例中有 4 例(11%)。手术组 41 例中有 4 例(10%)和保守治疗组 44 例中有 2 例(5%)发生重大术后并发症。在方案分析中,手术组的平均(标准差)GIQLI 评分在 12 个月时比保守治疗组高 11.27 分(119.42 [17.98] vs 108.15 [19.28];95%置信区间,2.24-20.29;P=0.02),在 24 个月时高 10.43 分(117.24 [15.51] vs 106.82 [18.94];95%置信区间,1.52-19.33;P=0.02)。

结论和相关性

在这项随机临床试验中,与保守治疗相比,选择性乙状结肠切除术可有效预防复发性憩室炎,并在 2 年内改善生活质量。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02174926。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62a/10116381/b9e41a6282a0/jamasurg-e230466-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62a/10116381/b9e41a6282a0/jamasurg-e230466-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62a/10116381/b9e41a6282a0/jamasurg-e230466-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality-of-Life and Recurrence Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection vs Conservative Treatment Following Diverticulitis: Prespecified 2-Year Analysis of the LASER Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜择期乙状结肠切除术与憩室炎保守治疗后生活质量和复发结局:LASER 随机临床试验的预先指定的 2 年分析。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Jun 1;158(6):593-601. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0466.
2
Comparing Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection With Conservative Treatment in Improving Quality of Life of Patients With Diverticulitis: The Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection Following Diverticulitis (LASER) Randomized Clinical Trial.比较腹腔镜择期乙状结肠切除术与保守治疗对改善憩室炎患者生活质量的效果:憩室炎后腹腔镜择期乙状结肠切除术(LASER)随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):129-136. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5151.
3
Surgery versus conservative management for recurrent and ongoing left-sided diverticulitis (DIRECT trial): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.手术与保守治疗对左侧憩室炎复发和持续的影响(DIRECT 试验):一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;2(1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30109-1. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
4
Long-term Outcome of Surgery Versus Conservative Management for Recurrent and Ongoing Complaints After an Episode of Diverticulitis: 5-year Follow-up Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (DIRECT-Trial).经憩室炎发作后出现持续性和复发性症状时,手术治疗与保守治疗的长期疗效对比:一项多中心随机对照试验(DIRECT 试验)的 5 年随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):612-620. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003033.
5
Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: Long-term Outcomes From the Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜冲洗与原发性切除术治疗急性穿孔性憩室炎:来自斯堪的纳维亚憩室炎(SCANDIV)随机临床试验的长期结果。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):121-127. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5618.
6
Evidence-based Reviews in Surgery Long-term Outcome of Surgery Versus Conservative Management for Recurrent and Ongoing Complaints After an Episode of Diverticulitis: Five-year Follow-up Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (DIRECT-Trial).外科手术的循证评价:在憩室炎发作后出现反复发作和持续存在的症状时,手术与保守治疗的长期结局比较:一项多中心随机对照试验(DIRECT 试验)的 5 年随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):284-287. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003920.
7
Laparoscopic Lavage vs Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: The SCANDIV Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜灌洗与一期切除术治疗急性穿孔性憩室炎:SCANDIV 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1364-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12076.
8
Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: long-term results of a prospective, randomized trial.腹腔镜与开腹乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎:前瞻性随机试验的长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3373-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1728-8. Epub 2011 May 10.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative management for recurrent and ongoing diverticulitis (DIRECT trial).比较手术与保守治疗复发性和持续性憩室炎的多中心随机临床试验的成本效益分析(DIRECT 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2019 Mar;106(4):448-457. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11024. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
10
Randomized clinical trial of elective resection versus observation in diverticulitis with extraluminal air or abscess initially managed conservatively.择期手术切除与保守治疗后观察在伴有肠外气或脓肿的憩室炎初始治疗中的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):971-979. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10868. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-expanding metallic stents in colorectal obstructions caused by diverticular disease-a systematic review.自膨式金属支架在憩室病所致大肠梗阻中的应用——一项系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12084-7.
2
The DIVIPACT cohort profile: Evaluating the impact of colonic diverticulosis on daily life.DIVIPACT队列简介:评估结肠憩室病对日常生活的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul;27(7):e70155. doi: 10.1111/codi.70155.
3
Success in Diverticulitis Management: What Outcomes Really Matter?憩室炎治疗的成功:哪些结果真正重要?
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 Oct 4;38(4):283-289. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791558. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Quality of life in diverticular disease: translation and validation of the Danish version of the diverticulitis quality of life instrument (DV‑QOL).憩室病的生活质量:憩室炎生活质量量表(DV-QOL)丹麦语版本的翻译与验证
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 14;40(1):117. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04911-z.
5
Sigmoid Resection vs Conservative Treatment After Diverticulitis: Prespecified 4-Year Analysis of the LASER Randomized Clinical Trial.乙状结肠切除术与憩室炎后的保守治疗:LASER随机临床试验的预定4年分析
JAMA Surg. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0572.
6
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Elective Sigmoid Resection for Complicated Diverticulitis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助选择性乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室炎
JSLS. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00079. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
7
Diverticulitis in Older Adults: A Review of Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management.老年人憩室炎:病因、诊断及管理综述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1598-1607. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19388. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
8
Ambulatory management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AmbUDiv study): a multicentre, propensity score matching study.急性单纯性憩室炎的门诊管理(AmbUDiv 研究):一项多中心、倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Nov 18;39(1):184. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04759-9.
9
Acute diverticulitis requiring hospitalization according to regional discrepancies in France between 2013 and 2022: a nationwide study.法国 2013 年至 2022 年期间因地域差异导致需要住院治疗的急性憩室炎:一项全国性研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 8;409(1):337. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03536-0.
10
Diverticulitis: A Review of Current and Emerging Practice-Changing Evidence.憩室炎:当前及新出现的改变实践证据综述
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Dec 13;37(6):359-367. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777439. eCollection 2024 Nov.