Suppr超能文献

报告啮齿动物骨科研究中麻醉和镇痛使用的情况。

Reporting practices of anesthetic and analgesic use in rodent orthopedic research.

机构信息

The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.

Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 18;14(1):26225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76750-x.

Abstract

The Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines, along with the updated ARRIVE 2.0, provide a crucial framework for transparent reporting in animal research. These guidelines enhance the quality and reproducibility of studies while supporting animal welfare. However, concerns persist regarding the reporting practices of biomedical researchers in scientific articles related to anesthesia and analgesia despite the endorsement of ARRIVE guidelines, as has been demonstrated in previous descriptive analyses. The current study systematically reviews articles published from 2016 to 2023 that involve rodent orthopedic surgeries. These procedures were selected as our focus given that anesthetics and analgesics are essential for such high impact procedures. We highlight significant reporting gaps, noting that anesthetic and analgesic details were missing in 29.4% and 74.8% of the articles, respectively. Our findings reveal no correlation between reporting completeness and journal impact factors, indicating that this issue generalized across journals. Furthermore, among articles that did report analgesia use, we observed a low prevalence of multimodal analgesia. Overall, this study underscores the urgent need to develop effective strategies to improve reporting of anesthesia and analgesia in animal studies to enhance ethical standards, animal welfare, and the robustness and reproducibility of research.

摘要

《动物实验报告的体内实验(ARRIVE)指南》及其更新的 ARRIVE 2.0 为动物研究的透明报告提供了一个重要框架。这些指南提高了研究的质量和可重复性,同时支持动物福利。然而,尽管已经有了 ARRIVE 指南的认可,但在涉及麻醉和镇痛的科学文章中,生物医学研究人员的报告实践仍然存在问题,这在前瞻性分析中已经得到了证明。本研究系统地回顾了 2016 年至 2023 年期间发表的涉及啮齿动物骨科手术的文章。选择这些手术作为我们的研究重点,是因为在这些高影响力的手术中,麻醉剂和镇痛剂是必不可少的。我们强调了显著的报告空白,指出分别有 29.4%和 74.8%的文章缺少关于麻醉和镇痛的详细信息。我们的研究结果表明,报告的完整性与期刊影响因子之间没有相关性,这表明这个问题在各个期刊中都普遍存在。此外,在报告使用镇痛剂的文章中,我们观察到多模式镇痛的比例较低。总的来说,这项研究强调了迫切需要制定有效的策略来改进动物研究中麻醉和镇痛的报告,以提高伦理标准、动物福利以及研究的稳健性和可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63a0/11574255/92051a7ab385/41598_2024_76750_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验