Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验研究团体产前护理与个体产前护理对心理社会结局的影响。

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Psychosocial Outcomes.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2023 Nov;52(6):467-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of group prenatal care (GPNC) compared with individual prenatal care (IPNC) on psychosocial outcomes in late pregnancy, including potential differences in outcomes by subgroups.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

An academic medical center in the southeastern United States.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2,348 women with low-risk pregnancies who entered prenatal care before 20 6/7 weeks gestation were randomized to GPNC (n = 1,175) or IPNC (n = 1,173) and stratified by self-reported race and ethnicity.

METHODS

We surveyed participants during enrollment (M = 12.21 weeks gestation) and in late pregnancy (M = 32.51 weeks gestation). We used standard measures related to stress, anxiety, coping strategies, empowerment, depression symptoms, and stress management practices in an intent-to-treat regression analysis. To account for nonadherence to GPNC treatment, we used an instrumental variable approach.

RESULTS

The response rates were high, with 78.69% of participants in the GPNC group and 83.89% of participants in the IPNC group completing the surveys. We found similar patterns for both groups, including decrease in distress and increase in anxiety between surveys and comparable levels of pregnancy empowerment and stress management at the second survey. We identified greater use of coping strategies for participants in the GPNC group, particularly those who identified as Black or had low levels of partner support.

CONCLUSION

Group prenatal care did not affect stress and anxiety in late pregnancy; however, the increased use of coping strategies may suggest a benefit of GPNC for some participants.

摘要

目的

评估小组产前护理(GPNC)与个体产前护理(IPNC)相比对妊娠晚期心理社会结局的影响,包括亚组间潜在的结局差异。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

美国东南部一所学术医疗中心。

参与者

共有 2348 名低危妊娠的妇女,在 20 6/7 周妊娠前进入产前护理,随机分为 GPNC(n=1175)或 IPNC(n=1173),并按自我报告的种族和族裔分层。

方法

我们在入组时(M=12.21 周妊娠)和妊娠晚期(M=32.51 周妊娠)对参与者进行了调查。我们在意向治疗回归分析中使用了与压力、焦虑、应对策略、赋权、抑郁症状和压力管理实践相关的标准措施。为了考虑对 GPNC 治疗的不依从性,我们使用了一种工具变量方法。

结果

GPNC 组的响应率为 78.69%,IPNC 组的响应率为 83.89%,参与者的参与率很高。我们发现两组都有类似的模式,包括在两次调查之间,压力和焦虑的下降,以及第二次调查时妊娠赋权和压力管理的可比水平。我们发现 GPNC 组的参与者更多地使用应对策略,尤其是那些自我认同为黑人或伴侣支持程度较低的参与者。

结论

小组产前护理并没有影响妊娠晚期的压力和焦虑;然而,应对策略的增加使用可能表明 GPNC 对一些参与者有益。

相似文献

5
The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes.小组产前护理对心理社会结局的比较效果。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016 Apr;19(2):259-69. doi: 10.1007/s00737-015-0564-6. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
7
Well Child Visit Attendance for Group Prenatal Care Participants.团体产前护理参与者的健康儿童就诊情况。
Acad Pediatr. 2023 Mar;23(2):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.09.022. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Well Child Visit Attendance for Group Prenatal Care Participants.团体产前护理参与者的健康儿童就诊情况。
Acad Pediatr. 2023 Mar;23(2):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.09.022. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
4
Group Prenatal Care and Emergency Room Utilization.团体产前保健与急诊室利用率
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Oct;79(5):687-700. doi: 10.1177/10775587211059938. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
6
The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States.美国产前护理指南的演变。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):339-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验