Rosenblatt Abram, George Preethy, Ghose Sushmita Shoma, Zhu Xiaoshu, Ren Weijia, Krenzke Tom, Opsomer Jean, Daley Tamara, Dixon Lisa, Goldman Howard
Westat, Rockville, Maryland (Rosenblatt, George, Ghose, Zhu, Ren, Krenzke, Opsomer); Abt Associates, Durham, North Carolina (Daley); New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City (Dixon); School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore (Goldman).
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Nov 19:appips20230548. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230548.
The present study examined whether clients enrolled in coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs for first-episode psychosis (FEP) across 22 states and territories showed improved clinical and functional outcomes and assessed whether program- or client-level predictors were associated with client outcomes. The study included CSC programs that subscribe to a variety of models, including Early Assessment and Support Alliance, OnTrack, and NAVIGATE.
Deidentified demographic and outcome data were collected from clients (N=770) receiving CSC services in 36 programs at the time of program entry and every 6 months for up to 18 months. Programs participated in fidelity assessment by using the First-Episode Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale, version 1.0, developed for the study and based on the components of the CSC model defined by NIMH. Additional program-level variables assessed during the study included staff turnover rate and time spent on CSC services.
Across programs, clients experienced improved symptoms, higher quality of life, and improved social and role functioning. Of note, participants from high-income families had greater improvement in role functioning than participants from low-income families. Higher levels of fidelity predicted reduced symptoms and improved social functioning. Having a CSC team lead with time dedicated to the program was also associated with greater improvements in clients' symptoms and social functioning.
Clients showed improvements, regardless of program or demographic characteristic. Program-level findings suggest that fidelity to the core components of CSC is important for improving client outcomes across a range of specific program models.
本研究调查了在22个州和地区参加首发精神病(FEP)协调专科护理(CSC)项目的患者是否在临床和功能结局方面有所改善,并评估项目层面或患者层面的预测因素是否与患者结局相关。该研究纳入了采用多种模式的CSC项目,包括早期评估与支持联盟、OnTrack和导航项目。
在项目开始时以及之后每6个月收集一次去识别化的人口统计学和结局数据,共收集18个月,涉及36个项目中接受CSC服务的770名患者。项目通过使用为该研究开发的、基于美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)定义的CSC模型组件的《首发精神病服务保真度量表》1.0版参与保真度评估。研究期间评估的其他项目层面变量包括员工流失率和在CSC服务上花费的时间。
在所有项目中,患者的症状得到改善,生活质量提高,社会和角色功能也得到改善。值得注意的是,高收入家庭的参与者在角色功能方面的改善比低收入家庭的参与者更大。更高水平的保真度预示着症状减轻和社会功能改善。有一位将时间投入到该项目的CSC团队负责人也与患者症状和社会功能的更大改善相关。
无论项目或人口统计学特征如何,患者均有改善。项目层面的研究结果表明,对CSC核心组件的保真度对于在一系列特定项目模式中改善患者结局很重要。