Suppr超能文献

评估在线气管造口护理资源的可理解性和可信度。

Assessing the Comprehensibility and Trustworthiness of Online Tracheostomy Care Resources.

作者信息

Vishak M S, Surendran Adwaith Krishna, Rajkumar Anjali, Raj Ruben, Raja Kalaiarasi

机构信息

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5793-5798. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-05098-5. Epub 2024 Sep 21.

Abstract

Tracheostomy is a surgical procedure to create an opening in the neck to insert a tube into the trachea to help a person breathe. Proper cleaning and care of the tracheostomy tube is vital to prevent infections. Patients frequently use the internet to learn about tracheostomy tube care before and after the procedure. To assess the readability and reliability of 50 websites providing patient information on tracheostomy tube care. The websites were evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Gunning Fog score (GF), DISCERN score, and JAMA benchmark criteria. The mean FKGL was 6.2, FRES was 61.9 and GF score was 7.2, indicating moderate overall readability. The reliability scores were average, too, with mean DISCERN and JAMA scores being 3.2 and 1.8, respectively. There is immense scope for improvement in the readability and reliability of online resources on tracheostomy tube care for patients to comprehend the information quickly.

摘要

气管造口术是一种外科手术,通过在颈部开口将一根管子插入气管,以帮助患者呼吸。正确清洁和护理气管造口管对于预防感染至关重要。患者在手术前后经常会通过互联网了解气管造口管的护理知识。为了评估50个提供气管造口管护理患者信息的网站的可读性和可靠性。使用弗莱施-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)、弗莱施阅读简易度得分(FRES)、冈宁雾度得分(GF)、辨别得分和《美国医学会杂志》基准标准对这些网站进行评估。平均FKGL为6.2,FRES为61.9,GF得分为7.2,表明总体可读性中等。可靠性得分也处于平均水平,辨别得分和《美国医学会杂志》得分的平均值分别为3.2和1.8。为了让患者能够快速理解信息,气管造口管护理在线资源的可读性和可靠性还有很大的改进空间。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Comprehensibility and Trustworthiness of Online Tracheostomy Care Resources.评估在线气管造口护理资源的可理解性和可信度。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5793-5798. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-05098-5. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
6
Assessing the readability and quality of online written information on epistaxis.评估在线鼻出血书面信息的可读性和质量。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Jul;107(6):429-433. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0053. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

4
5
TRACHEOSTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT.气管切开术的并发症及其处理
Med J Armed Forces India. 1999 Jul;55(3):197-200. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30440-9. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
7
Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.在线气管造口护理资源的可读性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):272-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599814560338. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
10
Clinical consensus statement: tracheostomy care.临床共识声明:气管切开护理。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jan;148(1):6-20. doi: 10.1177/0194599812460376. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验