• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喉咽反流病中的唾液pH值检测

Salivary pH testing in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.

作者信息

R Chethana, Chutke Amruta, Jadhav Rohit, Ramanathan Siddharth, Shamkant Shamli

机构信息

Department of ENT Bharati Vidyapeet (Deemed to be), University Medical college, Pune, 411046 Maharashtra India.

Bharati Hospital and Research Centre Pune, 411046 Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5812-5817. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-05109-5. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12070-024-05109-5
PMID:39559112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569336/
Abstract

To determine salivary pH in patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) and compare it with that of normal individuals. A cross sectional analytical study was done. Adults with LPR as determined by Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) > 13 and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) > 7 were included in LPR group. Normal healthy adult participants with Reflux Symptom Index ≤ 3 and Reflux Finding Score ≤ 2 were included in non LPR group.32 participants were included in each groups. Salivary pH was determined in all participants using a standardized pH meter. Difference in salivary pH between two groups was statistically analyzed. The mean salivary pH in LPR group was 7.43 ± 0.77 and in non LPR group 7.0 ± 0.77. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean salivary pH between the two groups as determined by p value 0.004. The results of our exploratory study showed statistically significant difference in salivary pH between LPR and non LPR group. The salivary pH in 10(31.2%) out of 32 participants in LPR group was beyond the normal range and surprisingly the value was > 7.6, which was in contrast to acidic pH that was expected as per hypothesis. The rest 68.8% in LPR group had pH in the normal range. However salivary pH as a modality for diagnosing LPR cannot be concluded from such preliminary study with a small study population. This study forms a basis for future research for the role of salivary pH in LPR with better study designs and finer modalities of pH testing.

摘要

测定喉咽反流(LPR)患者的唾液pH值,并与正常个体进行比较。进行了一项横断面分析研究。反流症状指数(RSI)>13且反流发现评分(RFS)>7的LPR成年患者被纳入LPR组。反流症状指数≤3且反流发现评分≤2的正常健康成年参与者被纳入非LPR组。每组纳入32名参与者。使用标准化pH计测定所有参与者的唾液pH值。对两组之间唾液pH值的差异进行统计学分析。LPR组的平均唾液pH值为7.43±0.77,非LPR组为7.0±0.77。根据p值0.004确定,两组之间的平均唾液pH值存在统计学显著差异。我们的探索性研究结果显示,LPR组和非LPR组之间的唾液pH值存在统计学显著差异。LPR组32名参与者中有10名(31.2%)的唾液pH值超出正常范围,令人惊讶的是该值>7.6,这与假设中预期的酸性pH值相反。LPR组其余68.8%的参与者pH值在正常范围内。然而,不能从这样一个小研究人群的初步研究中得出唾液pH值作为诊断LPR的一种方式的结论。本研究为未来关于唾液pH值在LPR中的作用的研究奠定了基础,采用更好的研究设计和更精细的pH测试方式。

相似文献

1
Salivary pH testing in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.喉咽反流病中的唾液pH值检测
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5812-5817. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-05109-5. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
2
Usefulness of the Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score in the Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.反流症状指数和反流发现评分在喉咽反流管理中的实用性。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5170-5175. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04920-4. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
3
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
4
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3.
5
Diagnostic value of fasting hypopharyngeal salivary pepsin concentration test for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.空腹下咽唾液胃蛋白酶浓度检测对喉咽反流病的诊断价值
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jul 17;11(2):241-249. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.200. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
The Diagnostic Accuracy of the Nasopharyngeal Reflux Endoscopic Score (NRES) for Identifying Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.用于识别慢性鼻-鼻窦炎中喉咽反流疾病的鼻咽反流内镜评分(NRES)的诊断准确性
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):4293. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124293.
7
Role of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Prospective Study.功能性内镜鼻窦手术在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎合并喉咽反流患者中的作用:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5505-5512. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-05020-z. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins.对于小隐静脉曲张,腔内消融治疗(激光或射频)或泡沫硬化疗法与传统手术修复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):CD010878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010878.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Oropharyngeal pH-Monitoring in the Assessment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.口咽pH监测在喉咽反流评估中的应用
J Clin Med. 2021 May 29;10(11):2409. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112409.
2
The role of nonacid reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases.非酸性反流在咽喉反流病中的作用。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;277(10):2813-2819. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06015-6. Epub 2020 May 10.
3
Pepsin and oropharyngeal pH monitoring to diagnose patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.胃蛋白酶和口咽 pH 监测用于诊断咽喉反流患者。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jul;130(7):1780-1786. doi: 10.1002/lary.28320. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
4
Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review.喉咽反流病的评估和管理:最新综述。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May;160(5):762-782. doi: 10.1177/0194599819827488. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
5
Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.现代 GERD 诊断:里昂共识。
Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1351-1362. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
Pepsin in saliva as a diagnostic biomarker in laryngopharyngeal reflux: a meta-analysis.唾液中的胃蛋白酶作为喉咽反流的诊断生物标志物:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;275(3):671-678. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4845-8. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
7
Optimal timing of saliva collection to detect pepsin in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.检测喉咽反流患者胃蛋白酶时唾液采集的最佳时机
Laryngoscope. 2016 Dec;126(12):2770-2773. doi: 10.1002/lary.26018. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
Oropharyngeal Reflux Monitoring and Atypical Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.口咽反流监测与非典型胃食管反流病
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Mar;18(3):12. doi: 10.1007/s11894-016-0486-0.
9
Immunoserologic pepsin detection in the saliva as a non-invasive rapid diagnostic test for laryngopharyngeal reflux.免疫酶法检测唾液中的胃蛋白酶作为一种非侵入性的快速诊断喉咽反流的方法。
Balkan Med J. 2015 Jan;32(1):46-50. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15824. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
10
Correlation between oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with suspected GERD-related extra-esophageal symptoms.疑似胃食管反流病相关食管外症状患者口咽pH监测与食管pH阻抗监测的相关性
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Nov;26(11):1557-64. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12422. Epub 2014 Sep 10.