Suppr超能文献

喉咽反流病的评估和管理:最新综述。

Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review.

机构信息

1 Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists, International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France.

2 Department of Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Mons School of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May;160(5):762-782. doi: 10.1177/0194599819827488. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature on LPR epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment was conducted. Using the PRISMA statement, 3 authors selected relevant publications to provide a critical analysis of the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The important heterogeneity across studies in LPR diagnosis continues to make it difficult to summarize a single body of thought. Controversies persist concerning epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. No recent epidemiologic study exists regarding prevalence and incidence with the use of objective diagnostic tools. There is no survey that evaluates the prevalence of symptoms and signs on a large number of patients with confirmed LPR. Regarding diagnosis, an increasing number of authors used multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring, although there is no consensus regarding standardization of the diagnostic criteria. The efficiency of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy remains poorly demonstrated and misevaluated by incomplete clinical tools that do not take into consideration many symptoms and extralaryngeal findings. Despite the recent advances in knowledge about nonacid LPR, treatment protocols based on PPIs do not seem to have evolved.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The development of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and pepsin and bile salt detection should be considered for the establishment of a multiparameter diagnostic approach. LPR treatment should evolve to a more personalized regimen, including diet, PPIs, alginate, and magaldrate according to individual patient characteristics. Multicenter international studies with a standardized protocol could improve scientific knowledge about LPR.

摘要

目的

回顾有关咽喉反流(LPR)的流行病学、临床表现、诊断和治疗的当前文献。

资料来源

PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Scopus。

方法

对 LPR 流行病学、临床表现、诊断和治疗的文献进行了全面回顾。使用 PRISMA 声明,3 位作者选择了相关的出版物,对文献进行了批判性分析。

结论

LPR 诊断中的重要异质性仍然使得难以总结单一的思想体系。在流行病学、临床表现、诊断和治疗方面仍存在争议。没有最近的使用客观诊断工具的关于患病率和发病率的流行病学研究。没有评估大量确诊为 LPR 的患者的症状和体征的患病率的调查。在诊断方面,越来越多的作者使用多通道腔内阻抗-pH 监测,但诊断标准的标准化尚未达成共识。质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗的效率仍然证明不足,并且通过不完全的临床工具进行了错误评估,这些工具没有考虑到许多症状和喉外发现。尽管最近对非酸性 LPR 的认识有所提高,但基于 PPI 的治疗方案似乎并未发生变化。

实践意义

多通道腔内阻抗-pH 监测和胃蛋白酶及胆盐检测的发展应考虑用于建立多参数诊断方法。根据个体患者的特点,LPR 的治疗方法应发展为更个性化的方案,包括饮食、PPI、藻酸盐和镁铝碳酸盐。具有标准化方案的多中心国际研究可以提高对 LPR 的科学认识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验