Nourizadeh Navid, Ghezi Azam, Afzalzadeh Mohamadreza, Khaniki Saeedeh Hajebi, Behzad Hadi, Kafashan Setare, Jafarzadeh Sadegh
Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sinus and Surgical Endoscopic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Dec;76(6):5119-5125. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04876-5. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
Otosclerosis is a common cause of hearing loss, yet diagnosing it remains a challenge. Wideband Tympanometry Absorbance (WTA) has been proposed as a potential tool for improving diagnostic accuracy. The aim of study was to investigate the diagnostic value of WTA in diagnosing otosclerosis by comparing its results in patients with clinically diagnosed otosclerosis and a normal control group. This prospective study was conducted in Mashhad, Iran, from 2022 to 2023, involving 64 participants including otosclerosis and control. Inclusion criteria for the otosclerosis group included a clinical diagnosis of otosclerosis confirmed by audiometric tests and conventional tympanometry, and eligibility for surgical intervention. The control group consisted of individuals with normal clinical audiometric and tympanometric results. Both groups underwent conventional and WTA tympanometric assessments. The evaluation of WTA involved 64 participants, divided evenly between otosclerosis a normal ears group. Conventional tympanometry at 226 Hz showed significant differences in compliance between otosclerosis and normal ears ( = 0.02). In contrast, at 1000 Hz did not demonstrate significant differences in compliance ( = 0.2). Also, WTA did not demonstrate significant differences in compliance ( > 0.9). Measurements of gradient and resonance across both 226 and 1000Hz frequencies showed no statistically significant differences. The sensitivity and specificity of WTA, evaluated through compliance, were 72% and 40%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.50. The study illustrates that while conventional tympanometry is effective in distinguishing otosclerosis from normal tympanic conditions, WTA shows limited diagnostic efficacy. The moderate sensitivity and specificity of WTA suggest that it should not be relied upon as the sole diagnostic tool.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-04876-5.
耳硬化症是听力损失的常见原因,但对其进行诊断仍然是一项挑战。宽带鼓室导抗吸光度(WTA)已被提议作为提高诊断准确性的一种潜在工具。本研究的目的是通过比较临床诊断为耳硬化症的患者和正常对照组的结果,探讨WTA在诊断耳硬化症中的诊断价值。这项前瞻性研究于2022年至2023年在伊朗马什哈德进行,涉及64名参与者,包括耳硬化症患者和对照组。耳硬化症组的纳入标准包括经听力测试和传统鼓室导抗测试确诊的耳硬化症临床诊断,以及有手术干预的资格。对照组由临床听力测试和鼓室导抗测试结果正常的个体组成。两组均接受了传统和WTA鼓室导抗评估。对WTA的评估涉及64名参与者,在耳硬化症组和正常耳组之间平均分配。226Hz的传统鼓室导抗测试显示,耳硬化症组和正常耳组在声顺方面存在显著差异(P = 0.02)。相比之下,1000Hz时在声顺方面未显示出显著差异(P = 0.2)。此外,WTA在声顺方面也未显示出显著差异(P > 0.9)。在226Hz和1000Hz频率下的梯度和共振测量均未显示出统计学上的显著差异。通过声顺评估的WTA的敏感性和特异性分别为72%和40%,曲线下面积为0.50。该研究表明,虽然传统鼓室导抗测试在区分耳硬化症和正常鼓室情况方面有效,但WTA的诊断效能有限。WTA的中等敏感性和特异性表明,不应将其作为唯一的诊断工具。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s12070-024-04876-5获取的补充材料。