Conner Sean
Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55105, USA.
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 1;10(21):e39937. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39937. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
Recent pedagogical trends in post-secondary education focus on how providing students with greater autonomy through assignment submission flexibility offers benefits ranging from increased learning to stress reduction. Unfortunately, the relationship between submission flexibility and any specific benefit is not firmly established. One explanation for this is a potential misalignment between anticipated benefits and an understanding of how most students leverage extended opportunities for assignment completion. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between assignment submission flexibility and how students used the opportunity. Quantitative evidence reveals that most students routinely maximized the time taken before submitting assignments. This occurred independent of assignment type, teaching modality, or the duration of assignment availability. The results support a conclusion that most students do not capitalize on increased flexibility to meet the demands of their unique schedules. Instead, they appear to adapt their schedules to submit assignments shortly before a perceived deadline.
近期高等教育中的教学趋势聚焦于,通过作业提交灵活性为学生提供更大自主权如何带来从增强学习效果到减轻压力等诸多益处。不幸的是,提交灵活性与任何特定益处之间的关系尚未明确确立。对此的一种解释是,预期益处与对大多数学生如何利用延长的作业完成机会的理解之间可能存在偏差。本研究的目的是调查作业提交灵活性与学生如何利用该机会之间的关系。定量证据表明,大多数学生通常会将提交作业前的时间最大化。这种情况与作业类型、教学方式或作业可提交时长无关。结果支持这样一个结论:大多数学生并未利用增加的灵活性来满足其独特日程安排的需求。相反,他们似乎会调整自己的日程安排,以便在临近他们所认为的截止日期前提交作业。