• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将大型语言模型整合到心理健康实践中:基于专家访谈的定性描述研究。

Integrating large language models in mental health practice: a qualitative descriptive study based on expert interviews.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 4;12:1475867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1475867. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1475867
PMID:39559378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11571062/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Progress in developing artificial intelligence (AI) products represented by large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's ChatGPT has sparked enthusiasm for their potential use in mental health practice. However, the perspectives on the integration of LLMs within mental health practice remain an underreported topic. Therefore, this study aimed to explore how mental health and AI experts conceptualize LLMs and perceive the use of integrating LLMs into mental health practice.

METHOD

In February-April 2024, online semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 experts (12 psychiatrists, 7 mental health nurses, 2 researchers in medical artificial intelligence) from four provinces in China, using snowballing and purposive selection sampling. Respondents' discussions about their perspectives and expectations of integrating LLMs in mental health were analyzed with conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes and eleven sub-themes emerged from this study. Firstly, participants discussed the (1) practice and application reform brought by LLMs into mental health (fair access to mental health services, enhancement of patient participation, improvement in work efficiency and quality), and then analyzed the (2) technological-mental health gap (misleading information, lack of professional nuance and depth, user risk). Based on these points, they provided a range of (3) prerequisites for the integration of LLMs in mental health (training and competence, guidelines for use and management, patient engagement and transparency) and expressed their (4) expectations for future developments (reasonable allocation of workload, upgrades and revamps of LLMs).

CONCLUSION

These findings provide valuable insights into integrating LLMs within mental health practice, offering critical guidance for institutions to effectively implement, manage, and optimize these tools, thereby enhancing the quality and accessibility of mental health services.

摘要

背景

以 OpenAI 的 ChatGPT 为代表的人工智能 (AI) 产品的发展取得了进展,引发了人们对其在心理健康实践中应用的热情。然而,将大语言模型 (LLM) 整合到心理健康实践中的观点仍然是一个报道较少的话题。因此,本研究旨在探讨心理健康和 AI 专家如何概念化 LLM,并感知将 LLM 整合到心理健康实践中的使用。

方法

2024 年 2 月至 4 月,采用滚雪球和目的抽样法,从中国四个省份招募了 21 名专家(12 名精神科医生、7 名精神科护士、2 名医学人工智能研究员)进行在线半结构式访谈。使用常规内容分析法分析受访者对将 LLM 整合到心理健康中的观点和期望的讨论。

结果

本研究提出了四个主题和十一个子主题。首先,参与者讨论了 LLM 给心理健康带来的(1)实践和应用改革(公平获得心理健康服务、增强患者参与度、提高工作效率和质量),然后分析了(2)技术-心理健康差距(误导性信息、缺乏专业细微差别和深度、用户风险)。在此基础上,他们提出了一系列(3)将 LLM 整合到心理健康中的前提条件(培训和能力、使用和管理指南、患者参与和透明度),并表达了他们对未来发展的(4)期望(合理分配工作量、升级和改进 LLM)。

结论

这些发现为将 LLM 整合到心理健康实践中提供了有价值的见解,为机构有效实施、管理和优化这些工具提供了关键指导,从而提高了心理健康服务的质量和可及性。

相似文献

1
Integrating large language models in mental health practice: a qualitative descriptive study based on expert interviews.将大型语言模型整合到心理健康实践中:基于专家访谈的定性描述研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 4;12:1475867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1475867. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessing prognosis in depression: comparing perspectives of AI models, mental health professionals and the general public.评估抑郁症预后:比较人工智能模型、心理健康专业人员和公众的观点。
Fam Med Community Health. 2024 Jan 9;12(Suppl 1):e002583. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002583.
3
Large Language Models and User Trust: Consequence of Self-Referential Learning Loop and the Deskilling of Health Care Professionals.大语言模型与用户信任:自我参照学习循环的后果及医疗保健专业人员的技能退化
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 25;26:e56764. doi: 10.2196/56764.
4
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Providing Patient Education for Chinese Patients With Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: Mixed Methods Study.评估大语言模型为中国重症肌无力性眼病患者提供患者教育的有效性:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 10;27:e67883. doi: 10.2196/67883.
5
Comparing the Perspectives of Generative AI, Mental Health Experts, and the General Public on Schizophrenia Recovery: Case Vignette Study.生成式人工智能、心理健康专家和公众对精神分裂症康复的看法比较:案例情节研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Mar 18;11:e53043. doi: 10.2196/53043.
6
The Role of Large Language Models in Transforming Emergency Medicine: Scoping Review.大型语言模型在变革急诊医学中的作用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 10;12:e53787. doi: 10.2196/53787.
7
Utilizing large language models for gastroenterology research: a conceptual framework.利用大语言模型进行胃肠病学研究:一个概念框架。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 1;18:17562848251328577. doi: 10.1177/17562848251328577. eCollection 2025.
8
AI in Home Care-Evaluation of Large Language Models for Future Training of Informal Caregivers: Observational Comparative Case Study.家庭护理中的人工智能——对用于未来非正式护理人员培训的大语言模型的评估:观察性比较案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e70703. doi: 10.2196/70703.
9
Leveraging Large Language Models for Improved Patient Access and Self-Management: Assessor-Blinded Comparison Between Expert- and AI-Generated Content.利用大语言模型改善患者就医机会和自我管理:专家生成内容与人工智能生成内容的评估者盲法比较
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 25;26:e55847. doi: 10.2196/55847.
10
Assessing the Alignment of Large Language Models With Human Values for Mental Health Integration: Cross-Sectional Study Using Schwartz's Theory of Basic Values.评估大型语言模型与人类心理健康整合价值观的一致性:使用施瓦茨基本价值观理论的横断面研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Apr 9;11:e55988. doi: 10.2196/55988.

引用本文的文献

1
Sentiment analysis in public health: a systematic review of the current state, challenges, and future directions.公共卫生中的情感分析:对当前状况、挑战及未来方向的系统综述
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1609749. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1609749. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
User perceptions and experiences of an AI-driven conversational agent for mental health support.用户对用于心理健康支持的人工智能驱动对话代理的认知与体验。
Mhealth. 2024 Jul 5;10:22. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-23-55. eCollection 2024.
2
The Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health.大语言模型在精神健康中的机遇与风险。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jul 29;11:e59479. doi: 10.2196/59479.
3
The Application of ChatGPT in Medicine: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis.ChatGPT在医学中的应用:一项范围综述和文献计量分析。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Apr 18;17:1681-1692. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S463128. eCollection 2024.
4
Exploring the Association Between Textual Parameters and Psychological and Cognitive Factors.探索文本参数与心理和认知因素之间的关联。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Mar 13;17:1139-1150. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S460503. eCollection 2024.
5
The Limits of Clinician Vigilance as an AI Safety Bulwark.临床医生警觉性作为人工智能安全保障的局限性。
JAMA. 2024 Apr 9;331(14):1173-1174. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.3620.
6
Critical review of self-diagnosis of mental health conditions using artificial intelligence.对使用人工智能进行心理健康状况自我诊断的批判性综述。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Apr;33(2):344-358. doi: 10.1111/inm.13303. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
7
Assessing the Effectiveness of ChatGPT in Delivering Mental Health Support: A Qualitative Study.评估ChatGPT在提供心理健康支持方面的有效性:一项定性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jan 31;17:461-471. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S447368. eCollection 2024.
8
ChatGPT is not ready yet for use in providing mental health assessment and interventions.ChatGPT目前还未准备好用于提供心理健康评估和干预。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 4;14:1277756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1277756. eCollection 2023.
9
The Adoption of AI in Mental Health Care-Perspectives From Mental Health Professionals: Qualitative Descriptive Study.心理健康护理中人工智能的应用——心理健康专业人员的观点:定性描述性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 7;7:e47847. doi: 10.2196/47847.
10
AI and ethics in mental health: exploring the controversy over the use of ChatGPT.人工智能与心理健康伦理:探讨围绕ChatGPT使用的争议
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 May 29;46(2):e340-e341. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad254.