Suppr超能文献

社交焦虑障碍认知疗法中的改变过程:面对面治疗与基于互联网治疗形式的比较

Change processes in cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder: A comparison of face-to-face and internet-based treatment formats.

作者信息

Thew Graham R, Ehlers Anke, Clark David M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, The Old Rectory, Paradise Square, Oxford OX1 1TW, UK.

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2024 Nov 2;38:100786. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100786. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared to efficacy research, studies investigating the processes of change in psychological therapy are rare, especially for internet-based interventions. While many online therapies are based on face-to-face therapy protocols, it is unknown whether the processes of clinical improvement differ between these treatment formats.

OBJECTIVE

To examine candidate change processes in an online therapist-guided cognitive therapy intervention for social anxiety disorder (iCT-SAD), and compare the results to the corresponding face-to-face therapy (CT-SAD).

METHODS

Data from a randomised controlled trial ( = 99) were analysed using Multilevel Structural Equation Models, incorporating the temporal precedence of the process variable, and disaggregating the within- and between-subject components of the predictors. These examined three candidate change processes: self-focused attention, negative social cognitions, and depressed mood. Moderated mediation models provided an additional test of the moderating effect of treatment format.

RESULTS

Negative social cognitions and self-focused attention were supported as significant mediators of clinical improvement in both CT-SAD and iCT-SAD. Effects were of similar strength and moderated mediation was not observed. There was also evidence of cyclical relationships between social anxiety symptoms and these process variables. Depressed mood also emerged as a significant but weak mediator in CT-SAD, but not in iCT-SAD. Moderated mediation was not observed.

CONCLUSION

The online format of therapy showed a similar pattern of change processes to face-to-face treatment, with self-focused attention and negative social cognitions mediating clinical improvement in both treatments. Efforts to improve the efficacy and efficiency of SAD interventions by targeting these factors may therefore be equally applicable to online and face-to-face interventions.

摘要

背景

与疗效研究相比,探究心理治疗中改变过程的研究较少,尤其是针对基于互联网的干预措施。虽然许多在线治疗是基于面对面治疗方案,但尚不清楚这些治疗形式之间临床改善的过程是否存在差异。

目的

研究针对社交焦虑障碍的在线治疗师指导的认知疗法干预(iCT-SAD)中的候选改变过程,并将结果与相应的面对面治疗(CT-SAD)进行比较。

方法

使用多水平结构方程模型分析来自一项随机对照试验(n = 99)的数据,纳入过程变量的时间优先性,并分解预测变量的组内和组间成分。这些模型检验了三个候选改变过程:自我关注、消极社会认知和抑郁情绪。调节中介模型提供了对治疗形式调节作用的额外检验。

结果

消极社会认知和自我关注被证实是CT-SAD和iCT-SAD中临床改善的重要中介因素。效应强度相似,未观察到调节中介作用。也有证据表明社交焦虑症状与这些过程变量之间存在循环关系。抑郁情绪在CT-SAD中也表现为一个显著但较弱的中介因素,但在iCT-SAD中并非如此。未观察到调节中介作用。

结论

在线治疗形式显示出与面对面治疗相似的改变过程模式,自我关注和消极社会认知在两种治疗中均介导临床改善。因此,通过针对这些因素来提高社交焦虑障碍干预措施的疗效和效率的努力可能同样适用于在线和面对面干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e51d/11570918/0e86a5f6b3cd/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验