Andersson Gerhard, Titov Nickolai, Dear Blake F, Rozental Alexander, Carlbring Per
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):20-28. doi: 10.1002/wps.20610.
Internet interventions, and in particular Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT), have existed for at least 20 years. Here we review the treatment approach and the evidence base, arguing that ICBT can be viewed as a vehicle for innovation. ICBT has been developed and tested for several psychiatric and somatic conditions, and direct comparative studies suggest that therapist-guided ICBT is more effective than a waiting list for anxiety disorders and depression, and tends to be as effective as face-to-face CBT. Studies on the possible harmful effects of ICBT are also reviewed: a significant minority of people do experience negative effects, although rates of deterioration appear similar to those reported for face-to-face treatments and lower than for control conditions. We further review studies on change mechanisms and conclude that few, if any, consistent moderators and mediators of change have been identified. A recent trend to focus on knowledge acquisition is considered, and a discussion on the possibilities and hurdles of implementing ICBT is presented. The latter includes findings suggesting that attitudes toward ICBT may not be as positive as when using modern information technology as an adjunct to face-to-face therapy (i.e., blended treatment). Finally, we discuss future directions, including the role played by technology and machine learning, blended treatment, adaptation of treatment for minorities and non-Western settings, other therapeutic approaches than ICBT (including Internet-delivered psychodynamic and interpersonal psychotherapy as well as acceptance and commitment therapy), emerging regulations, and the importance of reporting failed trials.
互联网干预措施,尤其是互联网认知行为疗法(ICBT),已经存在了至少20年。在此,我们回顾了其治疗方法和证据基础,认为ICBT可被视为一种创新手段。ICBT已针对多种精神和躯体疾病进行了开发和测试,直接对比研究表明,有治疗师指导的ICBT在治疗焦虑症和抑郁症方面比等待名单更有效,且往往与面对面的认知行为疗法(CBT)效果相当。我们还回顾了关于ICBT可能有害影响的研究:虽然恶化率似乎与面对面治疗报告的相似且低于对照条件,但确实有相当一部分人经历了负面影响。我们进一步回顾了关于改变机制的研究,并得出结论,几乎没有发现一致的改变调节因素和中介因素。我们考虑了最近关注知识获取的趋势,并讨论了实施ICBT的可能性和障碍。后者包括一些研究结果,表明人们对ICBT的态度可能不如将现代信息技术用作面对面治疗的辅助手段(即混合治疗)时那么积极。最后,我们讨论了未来的方向,包括技术和机器学习所起的作用、混合治疗、针对少数群体和非西方环境调整治疗方法、ICBT之外的其他治疗方法(包括互联网心理动力疗法和人际心理疗法以及接受与承诺疗法)、新出现的法规以及报告失败试验的重要性。