Thrikutam Nikhitha, Kopp Charles M, Orton Caitlin, Bamer Alyssa M, Schneider Jeffrey C, Solis-Beach Kyra, Kazis Lewis E, Yenikomshian Haig A, Kowalske Karen, Stewart Barclay T
Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
J Burn Care Res. 2025 Aug 12;46(3):489-494. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae203.
Return to work (RTW) after burn injury is dependent on many variables, including type and location of burn injury, access to care, and preinjury mental and physical health. Noting that prior studies were limited by small sample sizes, we aimed to use a large database to explore the associations between hand burn severity, functional hand outcomes, and RTW postinjury. Data from a multicenter longitudinal study were analyzed. Adults with burn injuries were classified into 6 groups ranking in the severity of hand injury: (0) no hand burns, (1) single hand burn no grafting, (2) bilateral hand burn no grafting, (3) single hand burn requiring grafting, (4) bilateral hand burn requiring unilateral graft, and (5) bilateral hand burn requiring bilateral grafts. Grafting was used as a proxy for burn severity. Self-reported employment status, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) scores, and reported requests for work accommodations were collected at discharge, 6-, 12-, and 24-month postinjury. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Tukey test were completed to examine differences in outcomes by hand injury severity. A total of 4621 participants met the inclusion criteria. Group 5, those with the most severe burns, had significantly longer RTW times than groups 0-3 (P < 0.005). Group 5's (bilateral burn/unilateral graft) average RTW was greater, however, not significantly, compared to group 4. At 6 months, the mean PROMIS UE scores for grafted groups (group 3, 40.6; group 5, 35.4) were significantly worse than non-grafted groups (group 1, 46.8; group 2, 45.0; P < 0.0001). At 12 and 24 months, mean PROMIS UE scores were worse for grafted groups, though differences were no longer significant compared to non-grafted groups. At every time point, the majority of respondents did not request accommodations for their injuries from their employers, regardless of severity. Burn severity plays a significant role in both RTW and hand function for participants with hand burns. In addition, the lack of correlation between burn severity and request for work accommodations hints at the baseline vulnerability of these populations. These findings suggest a need for systematic improvements in the way these patients are cared for and re-integrated into the workforce.
烧伤后重返工作岗位(RTW)取决于许多因素,包括烧伤的类型和部位、获得治疗的机会以及伤前的身心健康状况。鉴于先前的研究受样本量小的限制,我们旨在使用一个大型数据库来探讨手部烧伤严重程度、手部功能结局与伤后重返工作岗位之间的关联。对一项多中心纵向研究的数据进行了分析。烧伤成人被分为6组,根据手部损伤的严重程度排序:(0)无手部烧伤,(1)单手烧伤未植皮,(2)双手烧伤未植皮,(3)单手烧伤需要植皮,(4)双手烧伤需要单侧植皮,(5)双手烧伤需要双侧植皮。植皮被用作烧伤严重程度的替代指标。在出院时、伤后6个月、12个月和24个月收集自我报告的就业状况、患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)上肢(UE)评分以及报告的工作调整需求。完成描述性统计和方差分析(ANOVA)以及事后Tukey检验,以检查手部损伤严重程度在结局方面的差异。共有4621名参与者符合纳入标准。第5组,即烧伤最严重的组,其重返工作岗位的时间明显长于第0 - 3组(P < 0.005)。然而,与第4组相比,第5组(双手烧伤/单侧植皮)的平均重返工作岗位时间更长,但差异不显著。在6个月时,植皮组(第3组,40.6;第5组,35.4)的平均PROMIS UE评分显著低于未植皮组(第1组,46.8;第2组,45.0;P < 0.0001)。在12个月和24个月时,植皮组的平均PROMIS UE评分更差,不过与未植皮组相比差异不再显著。在每个时间点,无论严重程度如何,大多数受访者都未向雇主提出因伤所需的工作调整要求。烧伤严重程度在手部烧伤参与者的重返工作岗位和手部功能方面都起着重要作用。此外,烧伤严重程度与工作调整需求之间缺乏相关性,这暗示了这些人群的基线脆弱性。这些发现表明,需要对这些患者的护理方式以及重新融入劳动力队伍的方式进行系统性改进。