Lynch Grant P, Mavros Yorgi, Jay Ollie
Thermal Ergonomics Laboratory, Heat and Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2025 Jan 1;138(1):136-143. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00919.2023. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
The aim of the present study was to quantify the time course of changes in maximum skin wettedness (ω)-that is, the proportion of skin surface area covered in sweat at the point of uncompensable heat stress, throughout seven consecutive days of heat acclimation. Nine adults (6 M, 3 F) completed a humidity-ramp protocol (RAMP) on , , , and of seven consecutive days of heat acclimation. In each RAMP trial, participants cycled continuously at 275 W·m for 120 min at 37°C: 60 min at a vapor pressure of 2.05 kPa followed by 60 min with vapor pressure increased by 0.045 kPa·min. An upward inflection in esophageal temperature (T) signaled a transition to uncompensable heat stress with the critical water vapor pressure at that point used to calculate ω. In days between RAMP assessments, participants cycled for 90 min at 75% HR at 37°C, 60% RH. T, whole body sweat rate (WBSR), local sweat rates on the back and forearm (LSR and LSR, respectively), and activated sweat gland density (ASGD) were measured throughout. ω was progressively and significantly greater from (0.68 ± 0.10) to (0.75 ± 0.10; = 0.002), to (0.79 ± 0.10; = 0.004), and to (0.87 ± 0.06; = 0.009). WBSR was higher on (1.11 ± 0.30 L·h; = 0.01) and (1.12 ± 0.19 L·h; < 0.001) compared with (0.94 ± 0.21 L·h). ASGD was higher on (78 ± 15 glands·cm; < 0.001) and 7 (81 ± 17 glands·cm; = 0.001) compared with (65 ± 12 glands·cm). There were no observed differences in sweat gland output ( = 0.21). In conclusion, ω significantly increased throughout 7 days of heat acclimation. These progressive increases in ω were predominantly mediated by an increase in the number of active sweat glands, not the output per gland. Significant increases in ω were observed as early as 3 days into a 7-day heat acclimation protocol. These data are the first to report dynamic changes in ω with progressive heat acclimation and provide new information about ω levels between the standard "unacclimated" and "acclimated" states in existing heat stress models.
本研究的目的是量化在连续7天的热适应过程中,最大皮肤湿润度(ω)的变化时间进程,即无法代偿的热应激点时皮肤表面积被汗液覆盖的比例。9名成年人(6名男性,3名女性)在连续7天热适应的第2、4、6和7天完成了湿度递增方案(RAMP)。在每个RAMP试验中,参与者在37°C下以275 W·m的功率持续骑行120分钟:在2.05 kPa的水汽压下骑行60分钟,随后水汽压以0.045 kPa·min的速度增加并骑行60分钟。食管温度(T)的向上拐点标志着向无法代偿的热应激转变,此时的临界水汽压用于计算ω。在RAMP评估之间的日子里,参与者在37°C、60%相对湿度下以75%心率骑行90分钟。全程测量T、全身出汗率(WBSR)、背部和前臂的局部出汗率(分别为LSR和LSR)以及激活的汗腺密度(ASGD)。从第2天(0.68±0.10)到第4天(0.75±0.10;P = 0.002)、第6天(0.79±0.10;P = 0.004)和第7天(0.87±0.06;P = 0.009),ω逐渐且显著增加。与第2天(0.94±0.21 L·h)相比,第4天(1.11±0.30 L·h;P = 0.01)和第6天(1.12±0.19 L·h;P < 0.001)的WBSR更高。与第2天(65±12个腺体·cm²)相比,第4天(78±15个腺体·cm²;P < 0.001)和第6天(81±17个腺体·cm²;P = 0.001)的ASGD更高。未观察到汗腺分泌量的差异(P = 0.21)。总之,在7天的热适应过程中,ω显著增加。这些ω的逐渐增加主要是由活跃汗腺数量的增加介导的,而不是每个腺体的分泌量。早在7天热适应方案的第3天就观察到ω显著增加。这些数据首次报告了随着热适应进展ω的动态变化,并提供了现有热应激模型中标准“未适应”和“适应”状态之间ω水平的新信息。