Sekhon A S, Standard P G, Kaufman L, Garg A K
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Mar;4(3):215-21. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90100-8.
A recent study suggested that Chrysosporium species have the same diagnostic antigens as Histoplasma capsulatum and Blastomyces dermatitidis and, thus, compromise the antigenic identification of these pathogens. In light of these findings, studies were undertaken to determine the reliability of the exoantigen tests for identifying B. dermatitidis and H. capsulatum organisms from cultures. Sixty-three slant or shake culture extracts, or both, were derived from C. asperatum, C. keratinophilum, C. parvum, C. pruinosum, C. parvum var. crescens, Geomyces (Chrysosporium) pannorus, B. dermatitidis, and H. capsulatum. These were analyzed by use of a commercial exoantigen kit and exoantigen test reagents obtained from a commercial source. The results of these analyses were compared with those obtained with Centers for Disease Control reagents. Many of the extracts derived from nonpathogenic fungi produced nonspecific precipitin bands when reacted with the kit and reference antisera, particularly the B. dermatitidis antisera. None, however, produced antigens identical to the specific B. dermatitidis A and H. capsulatum H and M antigens. Our findings indicate that the properly controlled immunoidentification procedure is 100% specific for B. dermatitidis and H. capsulatum, and that cross-reacting antigens derived from morphologically similar saparophytic fungi do not pose identification problems.
最近的一项研究表明,金孢子菌属与荚膜组织胞浆菌和皮炎芽生菌具有相同的诊断抗原,因此会影响这些病原体的抗原鉴定。鉴于这些发现,开展了多项研究以确定外抗原试验从培养物中鉴定皮炎芽生菌和荚膜组织胞浆菌的可靠性。63份斜面或振荡培养物提取物(或两者皆有)分别来自阿氏金孢子菌、嗜角质金孢子菌、小型金孢子菌、粉状金孢子菌、小型金孢子菌新月变种、地丝菌(金孢子菌)、皮炎芽生菌和荚膜组织胞浆菌。使用从商业渠道获得的商用外抗原试剂盒和外抗原测试试剂对这些提取物进行分析。将这些分析结果与使用疾病控制中心试剂获得的结果进行比较。许多来自非致病性真菌的提取物在与试剂盒和参考抗血清反应时会产生非特异性沉淀带,尤其是与皮炎芽生菌抗血清反应时。然而,没有一种提取物产生与特异性皮炎芽生菌A抗原以及荚膜组织胞浆菌H和M抗原相同的抗原。我们的研究结果表明,经过适当控制的免疫鉴定程序对皮炎芽生菌和荚膜组织胞浆菌具有100%的特异性,并且来自形态学上相似的腐生真菌的交叉反应抗原不会造成鉴定问题。