Wexler H M, Harris B, Carter W T, Finegold S M
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Mar;4(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90104-5.
Two hundred and forty-six strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group, all clinical isolates, collected at the Wadsworth Veterans Administration Medical Center from 1977 to 1982, were tested for susceptibility to clindamycin and cefoxitin. There was no significant change in resistance to either clindamycin or cefoxitin over the time period tested for any individual species, nor for the B. fragilis group in toto. Striking differences in susceptibility to the two drugs were seen among species of the B. fragilis group. B. fragilis displayed resistance to cefoxitin (32 micrograms/ml) and clindamycin (8 micrograms/ml) of 0.0% and 0.8%, respectively, whereas B. thetaiotaomicron showed resistances of 12.7% to cefoxitin (32 micrograms/ml) and 9% to clindamycin (8 micrograms/ml). B. thetaiotaomicron, B. distasonis, and B. ovatus are distinctly more resistant to cefoxitin than B. fragilis and B. vulgatus. Similarly B. thetaiotaomicron and B. distasonis are much more resistant to clindamycin than are the other B. fragilis group species. It is apparent that determination of species within the B. fragilis group is important in evaluating a potential therapeutic regimen.
1977年至1982年期间,在沃兹沃思退伍军人管理局医疗中心收集的246株脆弱拟杆菌属菌株均为临床分离株,对克林霉素和头孢西丁的敏感性进行了检测。在所检测的时间段内,对于任何单个菌种或整个脆弱拟杆菌属而言,对克林霉素或头孢西丁的耐药性均无显著变化。在脆弱拟杆菌属的各个菌种之间,对这两种药物的敏感性存在显著差异。脆弱拟杆菌对头孢西丁(32微克/毫升)和克林霉素(8微克/毫升)的耐药率分别为0.0%和0.8%,而多形拟杆菌对头孢西丁(32微克/毫升)和克林霉素(8微克/毫升)的耐药率分别为12.7%和9%。与脆弱拟杆菌和普通拟杆菌相比,多形拟杆菌、解脲拟杆菌和卵形拟杆菌对头孢西丁的耐药性明显更高。同样,与脆弱拟杆菌属的其他菌种相比,多形拟杆菌和解脲拟杆菌对克林霉素的耐药性要强得多。显然,在评估潜在的治疗方案时,确定脆弱拟杆菌属内的菌种很重要。