Colombo J, Horowitz F D
Child Dev. 1986 Apr;57(2):287-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00027.x.
In 3 experiments, the attentional responses of 4-month-old infants to frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps corresponding to the frequency range of adult-to-infant and adult-to-adult intonation patterns were assessed. In Experiment 1, infants were observed to discriminate "exaggerated" (i.e., adult-to-infant) FM sweeps from "normal" (i.e., adult-to-adult) FM sweeps in a habituation-dishabituation paradigm but did not selectively attend to one over the other. In Experiment 2, where the same stimuli were used in a paired-comparison paradigm, again no differential attention was observed. In Experiment 3, the most exaggerated sweep was paired against a continuous, monotonic pure tone, but again no difference in salience was observed. These data suggest that the extent of modulation or intonation of an auditory stimulus per se does not constitute a salient cue for infants' attention to sound.
在3项实验中,评估了4个月大婴儿对与成人对婴儿及成人对成人语调模式频率范围相对应的调频(FM)扫描的注意力反应。在实验1中,观察到婴儿在习惯化-去习惯化范式中能够区分“夸张的”(即成人对婴儿的)FM扫描和“正常的”(即成人对成人的)FM扫描,但并没有对其中一种扫描表现出选择性关注。在实验2中,使用相同的刺激进行配对比较范式实验,同样未观察到差异注意力。在实验3中,将最夸张的扫描与连续的单调纯音配对,但同样未观察到显著性差异。这些数据表明,听觉刺激本身的调制程度或语调并不构成婴儿对声音注意力的显著线索。