Lopes Alana, Rasmussen Sean, Au Ryan, Chakravarthy Vignesh, Chinnery Tricia, Christie Jaryd, Djordjevic Bojana, Gomez Jose A, Grindrod Natalie, Policelli Robert, Sharma Anurag, Tran Christopher, Walsh Joanna C, Wehrli Bret, Ward Aaron D, Cecchini Matthew J
Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Surg Pathol. 2024 Nov 20;33(4):10668969241294239. doi: 10.1177/10668969241294239.
The search for rare elements, like mitotic figures, is crucial in pathology. Combining digital pathology with eye-tracking technology allows for the detailed study of how pathologists complete these important tasks.
To determine if pathologists have distinct search characteristics in domain- and nondomain-specific tasks.
Six pathologists and six graduate students were recruited as observers. Each observer was given five digital "Where's Waldo?" puzzles and asked to search for the Waldo character as a nondomain-specific task. Each pathologist was then given five images of a breast digital pathology slide to search for a single mitotic figure as a domain-specific task. The observers' eye gaze data were collected.
Pathologists' median fixation duration was 244 ms, compared to 300 ms for nonpathologists searching for Waldo (< .001), and compared to 233 ms for pathologists searching for mitotic figures (= .003). Pathologists' median fixation and saccade rates were 3.17/second and 2.77/second, respectively, compared to 2.61/second and 2.47/second for nonpathologists searching for Waldo (< .001), and compared to 3.34/second and 3.09/second for pathologists searching for mitotic figures (= .222 and = .187, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two cohorts in their accuracy in identifying the target of their search.
When searching for rare elements during a nondomain-specific search task, pathologists' search characteristics were fundamentally different compared to nonpathologists, indicating pathologists can rapidly classify the objects of their fixations without compromising accuracy. Further, pathologists' search characteristics were fundamentally different between a domain-specific and nondomain-specific rare-element search task.
在病理学中,寻找有丝分裂象等稀有元素至关重要。将数字病理学与眼动追踪技术相结合,可以详细研究病理学家如何完成这些重要任务。
确定病理学家在领域特定和非领域特定任务中是否具有不同的搜索特征。
招募了六名病理学家和六名研究生作为观察者。每位观察者被给予五个数字版“威利在哪里?”拼图,并被要求寻找威利这个角色,作为非领域特定任务。然后,每位病理学家被给予五张乳腺数字病理切片图像,以寻找单个有丝分裂象,作为领域特定任务。收集观察者的眼动数据。
病理学家的平均注视持续时间为244毫秒,而寻找威利的非病理学家为300毫秒(<0.001),寻找有丝分裂象的病理学家为233毫秒(=0.003)。病理学家的平均注视率和扫视率分别为每秒3.17次和每秒2.77次,而寻找威利的非病理学家为每秒2.61次和每秒2.47次(<0.001),寻找有丝分裂象的病理学家为每秒3.34次和每秒3.09次(分别为=0.222和=0.187)。两组在识别搜索目标的准确性方面没有显著差异。
在非领域特定搜索任务中寻找稀有元素时,病理学家的搜索特征与非病理学家有根本不同,这表明病理学家可以在不影响准确性的情况下快速对其注视对象进行分类。此外,在领域特定和非领域特定的稀有元素搜索任务中,病理学家的搜索特征有根本不同。