Lopes Alana, Ward Aaron D, Cecchini Matthew
Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.
J Pathol Inform. 2024 May 17;15:100383. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100383. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Eye tracking has been used for decades in attempt to understand the cognitive processes of individuals. From memory access to problem-solving to decision-making, such insight has the potential to improve workflows and the education of students to become experts in relevant fields. Until recently, the traditional use of microscopes in pathology made eye tracking exceptionally difficult. However, the digital revolution of pathology from conventional microscopes to digital whole slide images allows for new research to be conducted and information to be learned with regards to pathologist visual search patterns and learning experiences. This has the promise to make pathology education more efficient and engaging, ultimately creating stronger and more proficient generations of pathologists to come. The goal of this review on eye tracking in pathology is to characterize and compare the visual search patterns of pathologists. The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using 'pathology' AND 'eye tracking' synonyms. A total of 22 relevant full-text articles published up to and including 2023 were identified and included in this review. Thematic analysis was conducted to organize each study into one or more of the 10 themes identified to characterize the visual search patterns of pathologists: (1) effect of experience, (2) fixations, (3) zooming, (4) panning, (5) saccades, (6) pupil diameter, (7) interpretation time, (8) strategies, (9) machine learning, and (10) education. Expert pathologists were found to have higher diagnostic accuracy, fewer fixations, and shorter interpretation times than pathologists with less experience. Further, literature on eye tracking in pathology indicates that there are several visual strategies for diagnostic interpretation of digital pathology images, but no evidence of a superior strategy exists. The educational implications of eye tracking in pathology have also been explored but the effect of teaching novices how to search as an expert remains unclear. In this article, the main challenges and prospects of eye tracking in pathology are briefly discussed along with their implications to the field.
几十年来,眼动追踪一直被用于试图理解个体的认知过程。从记忆提取到问题解决再到决策制定,这样的洞察有潜力改善工作流程以及学生教育,使其成为相关领域的专家。直到最近,病理学中传统显微镜的使用使得眼动追踪异常困难。然而,病理学从传统显微镜向数字全切片图像的数字革命使得新的研究得以开展,并能了解病理学家的视觉搜索模式和学习经验。这有望使病理学教育更高效且更具吸引力,最终培养出更强大、更精通的新一代病理学家。这篇关于病理学中眼动追踪的综述的目标是描述和比较病理学家的视觉搜索模式。使用“病理学”和“眼动追踪”的同义词在PubMed和科学网数据库中进行搜索。总共识别出截至2023年(包括2023年)发表的22篇相关全文文章,并纳入本综述。进行了主题分析,将每项研究组织到确定的10个主题中的一个或多个,以描述病理学家的视觉搜索模式:(1)经验的影响,(2)注视,(3)缩放,(4)平移,(5)扫视,(6)瞳孔直径,(7)解读时间,(8)策略,(9)机器学习,以及(10)教育。发现专家病理学家比经验较少的病理学家具有更高的诊断准确性、更少的注视次数和更短的解读时间。此外,病理学中眼动追踪的文献表明,对于数字病理学图像的诊断解读有几种视觉策略,但不存在一种优越策略的证据。病理学中眼动追踪的教育意义也已被探讨,但教新手如何像专家一样搜索的效果仍不明确。在本文中,简要讨论了病理学中眼动追踪的主要挑战和前景及其对该领域的影响。