Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts; Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts.
Department of Pathology, University of Vermont and Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, Vermont.
Mod Pathol. 2023 Jul;36(7):100162. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100162. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
An accurate histopathologic diagnosis on surgical biopsy material is necessary for the clinical management of patients and has important implications for research, clinical trial design/enrollment, and public health education. This study used a mixed methods approach to isolate sources of diagnostic error while residents and attending pathologists interpreted digitized breast biopsy slides. Ninety participants, including pathology residents and attending physicians at major United States medical centers reviewed a set of 14 digitized whole-slide images of breast biopsies. Each case had a consensus-defined diagnosis and critical region of interest (cROI) representing the most significant pathology on the slide. Participants were asked to view unmarked digitized slides, draw their participant region of interest (pROI), describe its features, and render a diagnosis. Participants' review behavior was tracked using case viewer software and an eye-tracking device. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated in comparison to the consensus diagnosis. We measured the frequency of errors emerging during 4 interpretive phases: (1) detecting the cROI, (2) recognizing its relevance, (3) using the correct terminology to describe findings in the pROI, and (4) making a diagnostic decision. According to eye-tracking data, trainees and attending pathologists were very likely (∼94% of the time) to find the cROI when inspecting a slide. However, trainees were less likely to consider the cROI relevant to their diagnosis. Pathology trainees (41% of cases) were more likely to use incorrect terminology to describe pROI features than attending pathologists (21% of cases). Failure to accurately describe features was the only factor strongly associated with an incorrect diagnosis. Identifying where errors emerge in the interpretive and/or descriptive process and working on building organ-specific feature recognition and verbal fluency in describing those features are critical steps for achieving competency in diagnostic decision making.
在外科活检材料中进行准确的组织病理学诊断对于患者的临床管理是必要的,并且对研究、临床试验设计/入组和公共卫生教育具有重要意义。本研究采用混合方法来分离在解释数字化乳腺活检切片时住院医师和主治病理医生的诊断错误来源。90 名参与者,包括美国主要医疗中心的病理住院医师和主治医生,查看了一组 14 张数字化全切片乳腺活检图像。每个病例都有一个共识定义的诊断和关键感兴趣区(cROI),代表切片上最重要的病理学。参与者被要求查看未标记的数字化切片,画出他们的参与者感兴趣区(pROI),描述其特征,并做出诊断。参与者的审查行为使用病例查看器软件和眼动追踪设备进行跟踪。通过与共识诊断进行比较来计算诊断准确性。我们测量了在 4 个解释阶段出现错误的频率:(1)检测 cROI,(2)识别其相关性,(3)使用正确的术语描述 pROI 中的发现,以及(4)做出诊断决策。根据眼动追踪数据,当检查切片时,住院医师和主治病理医生非常有可能(大约 94%的时间)找到 cROI。然而,住院医师不太可能认为 cROI 与他们的诊断相关。病理住院医师(41%的病例)比主治病理医生(21%的病例)更有可能使用不正确的术语来描述 pROI 特征。未能准确描述特征是唯一与错误诊断密切相关的因素。确定解释和/或描述过程中错误出现的位置,并努力建立特定器官的特征识别和描述这些特征的口头表达流利度,对于实现诊断决策能力至关重要。