当我们谈论社会经济地位时,我们指的是什么?对青少年心理健康的批判性综述对测量、机制及干预措施的启示。

What do we mean when we talk about socioeconomic status? Implications for measurement, mechanisms and interventions from a critical review on adolescent mental health.

作者信息

Zaneva Mirela, Dumbalska Tsvetomira, Reeves Aaron, Bowes Lucy

机构信息

Christ Church College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Gen Psychiatr. 2024 Nov 7;37(6):e101455. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2023-101455. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a well-established risk factor for general and mental health problems. However, there is no widely accepted definition or operationalisation for SES, leading to varied interpretations in research. In a critical review of the child and adolescent mental health literature, we map how SES is defined and measured. We examined 334 relevant papers from 2013 to 2024 and found significant variability in the operationalisation of SES. Our analysis revealed fundamental problems such as the lack of clear definitions, insufficient detail on variables used and limited measures directly reported by adolescents. We discuss issues related to measurement techniques and their impact on reproducibility, policy development and intervention design. Based on our findings, we recommend using SES measures that directly assess the socioeconomic position of children and adolescents. Additionally, we recommend researchers improve transparency and specificity in reporting the measures used and the rationale behind their selection. The wide range of distinct measures used to represent SES, coupled with insufficient reporting, likely hampers our understanding of which underlying factors truly drive observed effects and impedes the establishment of causal relationships. This, in turn, makes the path to effective health interventions more challenging.

摘要

社会经济地位低下是导致一般健康问题和心理健康问题的一个公认风险因素。然而,目前对于社会经济地位尚无广泛接受的定义或操作化方法,这导致研究中的解释各不相同。在对儿童和青少年心理健康文献的批判性综述中,我们梳理了社会经济地位是如何被定义和衡量的。我们研究了2013年至2024年的334篇相关论文,发现社会经济地位的操作化存在显著差异。我们的分析揭示了一些基本问题,比如缺乏明确的定义、所使用变量的细节不足以及青少年直接报告的测量方法有限。我们讨论了与测量技术相关的问题及其对可重复性、政策制定和干预设计的影响。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议使用直接评估儿童和青少年社会经济地位的测量方法。此外,我们建议研究人员在报告所使用的测量方法及其选择背后的理由时,提高透明度和具体性。用于代表社会经济地位的不同测量方法种类繁多,再加上报告不足,可能会妨碍我们理解哪些潜在因素真正驱动了观察到的效果,并阻碍因果关系的建立。反过来,这使得实现有效的健康干预变得更具挑战性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9deb/11575261/73a300878b49/gpsych-37-6-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索