Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and New York University Langone Health, New York, NY.
Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Transplantation. 2024 Apr 1;108(4):845-853. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004747. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
Evidence suggests that older patients are less frequently placed on the waiting list for kidney transplantation (KT) than their younger counterparts. The trends and magnitude of this age disparity in access to first KT and repeat KT (re-KT) remain unclear.
Using the US Renal Data System, we identified 2 496 743 adult transplant-naive dialysis patients and 110 338 adult recipients with graft failure between 1995 and 2018. We characterized the secular trends of age disparities and used Cox proportional hazard models to compare the chances of listing and receiving first KT versus re-KT by age (18-64 y versus ≥65 y).
Older transplant-naive dialysis patients were less likely to be listed (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.18) and receive first KT (aHR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.87-0.89) compared with their younger counterparts. Additionally, older patients with graft failure had a lower chance of being listed (aHR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.38-0.41) and receiving re-KT (aHR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81). The magnitude of the age disparity in being listed for first KT was greater than that for re-KT ( Pinteraction < 0.001), and there were no differences in the age disparities in receiving first KT or re-KT ( Pinteraction = 0.13). Between 1995 and 2018, the age disparity in listing for first KT reduced significantly ( P < 0.001), but the age disparities in re-KT remained the same ( P = 0.16).
Age disparities exist in access to both first KT and re-KT; however, some of this disparity is attenuated among older adults with graft failure. As the proportion of older patients with graft failure rises, a better understanding of factors that preclude their candidacy and identification of appropriate older patients are needed.
有证据表明,老年患者等待肾移植(KT)的时间比年轻患者要短。然而,目前尚不清楚这种在获得首次 KT 和重复 KT(re-KT)方面的年龄差异的趋势和幅度。
我们使用美国肾脏数据系统,确定了 1995 年至 2018 年间 2496743 名成年透析前移植患者和 110338 名移植后移植物失功的成年受者。我们描述了年龄差异的长期趋势,并使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较了按年龄(18-64 岁与≥65 岁)列出和接受首次 KT 与 re-KT 的几率。
与年轻患者相比,老年透析前患者的列入名单的可能性较低(调整后的危险比[aHR]=0.18;95%置信区间[CI],0.17-0.18),接受首次 KT 的可能性也较低(aHR=0.88;95%CI,0.87-0.89)。此外,移植后移植物失功的老年患者被列入名单的机会较低(aHR=0.40;95%CI,0.38-0.41),接受 re-KT 的机会也较低(aHR=0.76;95%CI,0.72-0.81)。列入首次 KT 名单的年龄差异幅度大于列入 re-KT 的年龄差异幅度(P 交互<0.001),但列入首次 KT 或 re-KT 的年龄差异无差异(P 交互=0.13)。1995 年至 2018 年间,首次 KT 列入名单的年龄差异显著降低(P<0.001),但 re-KT 的年龄差异保持不变(P=0.16)。
在获得首次 KT 和 re-KT 方面都存在年龄差异;然而,在移植后移植物失功的老年患者中,这种差异的一部分有所减轻。随着移植后移植物失功的老年患者比例增加,需要更好地了解阻止他们成为候选人的因素,并确定合适的老年患者。