van Straalen Roel J M, Broekstra Dieuwke C, Werker Paul M N, de Boer Michiel R
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, HPC BB81, P.O. box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Primary- and Long-term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O.-box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands.
Fam Pract. 2025 Feb 7;42(2). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae065.
When research and management of Dupuytren's disease (DD) shift from symptom relief to preventing contractures, general practitioner (GP) care may become more central to treatment. However, the presentation and course of DD in GP care are underexplored and this has been recognized as a knowledge gap that hinders effective treatment decisions. This study is the first to map the trajectory of DD patients in GP care.
Using electronic health records from Dutch general practices in a regional research network, we conducted a registration-based cohort study in a dynamic population. Descriptive statistics detailed patient demographics, number of contacts, and symptoms per contact. The time and number of contacts before diagnosis were also analysed. Sankey diagrams illustrated the relationship between management options and symptoms.
Over a 16-year period, 84% of patients with a DD diagnosis had visited their GP for this reason, with 73% only having one GP contact. The diagnosis was made at first contact for 93% of patients. Initial contacts often reported a lump (57.3%), but this symptom was less frequent in subsequent visits. 'Daily life impairment' increased after the first contact. The most common management options were referral to secondary care (37.7%) and watchful waiting (35.1%).
The diagnosis and management of DD in GP care are in line with the current guidelines. Less than half of the DD patients were referred to secondary care during follow-up. This may give room for preventive treatment that limits progression. Future studies should focus on the accuracy of diagnosis and the feasibility of effective treatments in GP care.
当掌腱膜挛缩症(DD)的研究与管理从缓解症状转向预防挛缩时,全科医生(GP)的护理可能在治疗中变得更为核心。然而,全科医疗中DD的表现和病程尚未得到充分研究,这已被视为阻碍有效治疗决策的知识空白。本研究首次描绘了全科医疗中DD患者的病程轨迹。
利用区域研究网络中荷兰全科医疗的电子健康记录,我们在一个动态人群中进行了一项基于登记的队列研究。描述性统计详细说明了患者的人口统计学特征、就诊次数以及每次就诊的症状。还分析了诊断前的就诊时间和次数。桑基图展示了管理选项与症状之间的关系。
在16年期间,84%被诊断为DD的患者因此去看了全科医生,其中73%只与一位全科医生有过接触。93%的患者在首次就诊时被确诊。初次就诊时经常报告有肿块(57.3%),但在后续就诊中这种症状不太常见。首次就诊后“日常生活受限”有所增加。最常见的管理选项是转诊至二级医疗(37.7%)和观察等待(35.1%)。
全科医疗中DD的诊断和管理符合当前指南。在随访期间,不到一半的DD患者被转诊至二级医疗。这可能为限制病情进展的预防性治疗留出空间。未来的研究应关注全科医疗中诊断的准确性和有效治疗的可行性。