Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Dec;75(6S):S24-S34. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.09.012.
This study aims to assess anxiety trends over the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluate how pandemic-related adversities modify trajectories among underprivileged adolescents from two distinct settings.
Data came from the Shanghai, China and Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo sites of the Global Early Adolescent Study. Data were collected three times over approximately two years: prior to the pandemic (T1) and during the pandemic (T2, T3). Analyses included adolescents (aged 10-16) with complete information on generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) across all time points (Shanghai N = 548; Kinshasa N = 334). Weighted Generalized Estimating Equations assessed anxiety at T2 and T3 relative to T1. Effect modification analyses were used to investigate if COVID-19-related adversities modified anxiety trajectories.
Six months into the pandemic, 15.3% (Shanghai) and 4.1% (Kinshasa) of adolescents reported having moderate-to-severe GAD. Adjusted Generalized Estimating Equation models did not suggest increases in GAD during the pandemic across both sites. However, female adolescents from Shanghai experienced increased anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-3.99) half a year into the pandemic. The trend was not sustained. COVID-related adversities did not modify anxiety trajectories in Kinshasa. In Shanghai, one year into the pandemic, we observed decreased odds of GAD among all (aOR: 0.31, 0.17-0.58) and female adolescents (aOR: 0.25, 0.08-0.75) without pandemic-associated negative household experiences.
The COVID-19 pandemic differentially affected adolescent anxiety by time, place, and gender. Future research should examine the roles of social context and resilience to better understand adolescents' mental distress and to guide health-promoting programs and policies for young people.
本研究旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行期间焦虑趋势,并评估与大流行相关的逆境如何改变来自两个不同环境的贫困青少年的轨迹。
数据来自中国上海和刚果民主共和国金沙萨的全球早期青少年研究地点。数据在大约两年的时间内收集了三次:大流行前(T1)和大流行期间(T2、T3)。分析包括在所有时间点都有广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)完整信息的青少年(年龄 10-16 岁)(上海 N=548;金沙萨 N=334)。加权广义估计方程评估了 T2 和 T3 相对于 T1 的焦虑情况。采用效应修饰分析来研究 COVID-19 相关逆境是否改变了焦虑轨迹。
大流行六个月后,15.3%(上海)和 4.1%(金沙萨)的青少年报告有中度至重度 GAD。调整后的广义估计方程模型并未表明两个地点在大流行期间 GAD 增加。然而,上海的女性青少年在大流行半年后经历了焦虑增加(调整后的优势比 [aOR]:2.27,95%置信区间:1.30-3.99)。这一趋势并未持续。COVID 相关逆境并未改变金沙萨的焦虑轨迹。在上海,大流行一年后,我们观察到所有(aOR:0.31,0.17-0.58)和没有大流行相关负面家庭经历的女性青少年(aOR:0.25,0.08-0.75)中 GAD 的几率降低。
COVID-19 大流行通过时间、地点和性别对青少年的焦虑产生了不同的影响。未来的研究应研究社会背景和韧性的作用,以更好地了解青少年的精神困扰,并为年轻人指导促进健康的计划和政策。