Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Dec;75(6S):S50-S56. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.09.001.
To identify the patterns of stressors associated with the COVID-19 pandemic among adolescents living in different cultural settings and to explore how adolescents cope with such stressors, particularly by type of stressor, site, and gender.
The study was based on focus group discussion data from 9 urban poor communities in Kinshasa (Democratic Republic of Congo), Blantyre (Malawi), Shanghai (China), Semarang and Denpasar (Indonesia), New Orleans (USA), Ghent (Belgium), São Paulo (Brazil), and Santiago (Chile). Translated transcripts from the focus group discussions were uploaded into ATLAS.ti (Version 9.1) and analyzed using an inductive thematic analytical approach to code and identify themes related to the primary objectives.
Adolescents in Blantyre and Kinshasa reported stressors primarily related to economic constraints and hardships, whereas adolescents in other sites were more likely to report stressors related to school lockdowns. Patterns of coping strategies also loosely aligned with these differences, as adolescents in Blantyre and Kinshasa were also more likely to report using religious coping strategies compared to any other site. Still, the most common coping mechanism mentioned across sites was obtaining social support, with support from friends and family being the most dominant.
A comprehensive understanding of adolescent stressors and coping mechanisms is valuable for promoting internal resources and positive outcomes for adolescents. Given that adolescents' stressors and types of coping strategies varied primarily by socioeconomic factors, interventions that aim to bolster positive coping among adolescents need to consider the local context and available resources.
识别生活在不同文化背景下的青少年与 COVID-19 大流行相关的压力源模式,并探讨青少年如何应对这些压力源,特别是根据压力源类型、地点和性别。
该研究基于金沙萨(刚果民主共和国)、布兰太尔(马拉维)、上海(中国)、三宝垄和登巴萨(印度尼西亚)、新奥尔良(美国)、根特(比利时)、圣保罗(巴西)和圣地亚哥(智利)9 个城市贫困社区的焦点小组讨论数据。焦点小组讨论的翻译记录被上传到 ATLAS.ti(版本 9.1)中,并使用归纳主题分析方法进行分析,以对与主要目标相关的主题进行编码和识别。
布兰太尔和金沙萨的青少年报告的压力源主要与经济限制和困难有关,而其他地点的青少年更有可能报告与学校停课有关的压力源。应对策略的模式也与这些差异大致一致,因为与任何其他地点相比,布兰太尔和金沙萨的青少年更有可能报告使用宗教应对策略。尽管如此,提到的最常见的应对机制是获得社会支持,朋友和家人的支持是最主要的。
全面了解青少年的压力源和应对机制对于促进青少年的内在资源和积极结果很有价值。鉴于青少年的压力源和应对策略的类型主要取决于社会经济因素,旨在增强青少年积极应对能力的干预措施需要考虑当地的情况和可用资源。