• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Incidence, Risk Factors and Predictors of Phantom Shocks in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: State-of-the-art Review.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者幻触的发生率、危险因素及预测因素:最新综述
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Nov 4;13:e18. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.25. eCollection 2024.
2
Phantom shocks unmasked: clinical data and proposed mechanism of memory reactivation of past traumatic shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.隐匿性电击暴露:植入式心脏复律除颤器患者既往创伤性电击记忆再激活的临床数据及机制探讨
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug;34(2):205-13. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9640-7. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
3
Psychological indices as predictors for phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.心理指标作为植入式心脏复律除颤器患者发生幻触的预测因素
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;37(6):768-73. doi: 10.1111/pace.12343. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
4
Incidence and predictors of phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.植入式心律转复除颤器患者中幻肢感电击的发生率及预测因素。
Neth Heart J. 2013 Apr;21(4):191-5. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0345-z.
5
Phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: impact of education level, anxiety, and depression.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的假性电击:教育水平、焦虑和抑郁的影响。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(3):306-312. doi: 10.1007/s00399-019-00645-y. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-Are there predictors of appropriate therapy?肥厚型心肌病患者的一级预防植入式心脏转复除颤器——是否存在合适治疗的预测因素?
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jan;18(1):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
7
A review of the evidence on the effects and costs of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in different patient groups, and modelling of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for these groups in a UK context.对不同患者群体中植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的效果和成本相关证据的综述,以及在英国背景下对这些群体的成本效益和成本效用进行建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(27):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta10270.
8
Appropriate and inappropriate shocks in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: An international multicenter study.肥厚型心肌病患者皮下植入式心律转复除颤器中的适当和不适当电击:一项国际多中心研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jul;17(7):1107-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
9
Protein biomarkers identify patients unlikely to benefit from primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators: findings from the Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (PROSE-ICD).蛋白质生物标志物可识别出不太可能从一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器中获益的患者:植入式心脏复律除颤器前瞻性观察研究(PROSE-ICD)的结果。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;7(6):1084-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001705. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
10
Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy to Avoid Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks.避免植入式心脏复律除颤器电击的抗心律失常药物治疗
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016 Aug;5(2):117-21. doi: 10.15420/AER.2016.10.2.

引用本文的文献

1
New Diseases Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): An Overview.与心脏植入式电子设备(CIEDs)相关的新疾病:概述
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 17;14(4):1322. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041322.

本文引用的文献

1
Phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: impact of education level, anxiety, and depression.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的假性电击:教育水平、焦虑和抑郁的影响。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(3):306-312. doi: 10.1007/s00399-019-00645-y. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
2
Strategies to Reduce Recurrent Shocks Due to Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with an Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillator.降低植入式心脏复律除颤器患者室性心律失常所致反复电击的策略。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2019 May;8(2):99-104. doi: 10.15420/aer.2018.55.5.
3
2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.2017年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会室性心律失常患者管理和心脏性猝死预防指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告
Circulation. 2018 Sep 25;138(13):e272-e391. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000549.
4
Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy to Avoid Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks.避免植入式心脏复律除颤器电击的抗心律失常药物治疗
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016 Aug;5(2):117-21. doi: 10.15420/AER.2016.10.2.
5
Do implantable cardioverter defibrillators contribute to new depression or anxiety symptoms? A retrospective study.植入式心脏复律除颤器会导致新的抑郁或焦虑症状吗?一项回顾性研究。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2016;20(2):101-5. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2016.1161055. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
6
Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association.欧洲心脏病学会成员国心脏电子设备使用情况及电生理手术统计:欧洲心律协会2014年报告
Europace. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:i1-75. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu300.
7
Psychological indices as predictors for phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.心理指标作为植入式心脏复律除颤器患者发生幻触的预测因素
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;37(6):768-73. doi: 10.1111/pace.12343. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
8
Phantom shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from a randomized rehabilitation trial (COPE-ICD).植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的幻影电击:一项随机康复试验(COPE-ICD)的结果。
Europace. 2013 Oct;15(10):1463-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut087. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
9
Uncovering phantom shocks in cardiac patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Jun;36(6):673-83. doi: 10.1111/pace.12116. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
10
Incidence and predictors of phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.植入式心律转复除颤器患者中幻肢感电击的发生率及预测因素。
Neth Heart J. 2013 Apr;21(4):191-5. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0345-z.

植入式心脏复律除颤器患者幻触的发生率、危险因素及预测因素:最新综述

Incidence, Risk Factors and Predictors of Phantom Shocks in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: State-of-the-art Review.

作者信息

Elenizi Khaled, Alharthi Rasha

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Cardiology, Dr Sulaiman Al-Habib Hospital Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Nov 4;13:e18. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.25. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.15420/aer.2024.25
PMID:39569079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11577870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extensive research has been devoted to ICDs, but there is still a significant gap in the literature regarding phantom shocks (PSs). Understanding the frequency, predictors, risk factors, management and health implications of PSs is essential. This review aimed to comprehensively investigate PSs in patients with ICDs up to the present day. Specifically, the review explores the incidence of PSs, identifies risk factors that may increase their likelihood and determines predictive factors to help anticipate their occurrence. By addressing these points, the study aimed to enhance the understanding and management of PSs in ICD patients.

METHODS

This study reviewed central databases from their inception up to March 2024. The primary objective was to examine the occurrence of PSs in patients with ICDs. Data were gathered on patient demographics, incidence rates, and various risk factors and predictors that might affect the occurrence of PSs. Then, a detailed analysis of the collected data was conducted to identify significant associations between these risk factors, predictors and the incidence of PSs.

RESULTS

This review identified a significant association between prior ICD shocks, defibrillation threshold testing, the presence of depression and anxiety for the occurrence of PS in patients with ICDs. This underscores the importance of thoroughly evaluating and managing these factors to improve the care of individuals with ICDs.

CONCLUSION

PSs are often associated with various factors, such as previous shock therapy, defibrillation threshold testing, depression, anxiety and higher levels of education. It is crucial for healthcare providers to acknowledge these correlations and provide personalised care to patients experiencing PSs.

摘要

背景

针对植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)已开展了广泛研究,但关于幻触(PSs)的文献仍存在显著空白。了解幻触的频率、预测因素、风险因素、管理方法及其对健康的影响至关重要。本综述旨在全面调查截至目前ICD患者中的幻触情况。具体而言,该综述探讨了幻触的发生率,识别可能增加其发生可能性的风险因素,并确定有助于预测其发生的预测因素。通过解决这些问题,该研究旨在增进对ICD患者幻触的理解和管理。

方法

本研究回顾了从数据库建立至2024年3月的中央数据库。主要目的是检查ICD患者中幻触的发生情况。收集了患者人口统计学数据、发生率以及可能影响幻触发生的各种风险因素和预测因素。然后,对收集到的数据进行详细分析,以确定这些风险因素、预测因素与幻触发生率之间的显著关联。

结果

本综述发现,既往ICD电击、除颤阈值测试、抑郁和焦虑的存在与ICD患者幻触的发生之间存在显著关联。这凸显了全面评估和管理这些因素对于改善ICD患者护理的重要性。

结论

幻触通常与各种因素相关,如既往电击治疗、除颤阈值测试、抑郁、焦虑和较高的教育水平。医疗保健提供者认识到这些相关性并为经历幻触的患者提供个性化护理至关重要。