Moe Gjertrud, Mjølstad Bente Prytz, Getz Linn Okkenhaug, Sodemann Morten, Ytterhus Borgunn
Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
General Practice Research Unit Trondheim, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Jun;43(2):281-291. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2428364. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
This study examines the experiences of clinical encounters with young unaccompanied refugees in Norway and Denmark among both general practitioners (GPs) and physicians in migrant health clinics (MHC physicians), and it identifies important aspects that should be taken into consideration for improving the quality of healthcare for these patients.
Ten individual in-depth interviews with physicians in Norway and Denmark were conducted and analysed using interpretative phenomenology. Axel Honneth's theory of recognition was our theoretical lens.
The physicians described these patients as vulnerable individuals. They adopted a variety of approaches in their encounters with young unaccompanied refugees spanning from a 'holistic' to an 'instrumental' approach. Those who described an instrumental approach focused on understanding and categorising symptoms from a biomedical perspective, while those describing a holistic approach considered 'the whole person' within their everyday context. Those with a more holistic approach also expressed the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and defined work-divide. Relationships of trust between physicians and the young unaccompanied refugees were shown to be an important facilitator for adequate healthcare, but this required availability, continuity, and dialogue.
Our results highlight how physicians' encounters with vulnerable young refugees actualize previously documented contrasts between holistic and instrumental approaches in clinical work. We argue that recognition in healthcare is conditional on physicians taking a holistic approach. This approach can help build relationships of trust and can support interdisciplinary collaboration. Moreover, such an approach can facilitate the essential components of Honneth's theory of recognition, namely social esteem and emotional support. Barriers to greater interdisciplinary collaboration in healthcare services need to be addressed at the system level.
本研究考察了挪威和丹麦的全科医生(GPs)以及移民健康诊所的医生(MHC医生)与无人陪伴的年轻难民进行临床接触的经历,并确定了在改善这些患者的医疗保健质量时应考虑的重要方面。
对挪威和丹麦的医生进行了十次个人深度访谈,并采用解释现象学进行分析。阿克塞尔·霍耐特的承认理论是我们的理论视角。
医生们将这些患者描述为弱势群体。他们在与无人陪伴的年轻难民接触时采用了多种方法,从“整体”方法到“工具性”方法。那些描述工具性方法的人侧重于从生物医学角度理解和分类症状,而那些描述整体方法的人则在日常背景中考虑“整个人”。采用更整体方法的人还强调了跨学科合作和明确分工的重要性。医生与无人陪伴的年轻难民之间的信任关系被证明是提供充分医疗保健的重要促进因素,但这需要可及性、连续性和对话。
我们的结果凸显了医生与弱势年轻难民的接触如何在临床工作中体现出先前记录的整体方法与工具性方法之间的差异。我们认为,医疗保健中的承认取决于医生采取整体方法。这种方法有助于建立信任关系,并支持跨学科合作。此外,这种方法可以促进霍耐特承认理论的基本要素,即社会尊重和情感支持。医疗服务中加强跨学科合作的障碍需要在系统层面加以解决。