Suppr超能文献

行为疼痛量表、生命体征和瞳孔测量在危重症患者疼痛评估中的应用:一项横断面研究。

Behavioral pain scales, vital signs, and pupilometry to pain assessment in the critically ill patient: A cross sectional study.

机构信息

University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz School of Nursing, José Atxotegi, Vitoria-Gasteiz 01009, Spain; Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Jose Atxotegi, Vitoria-Gasteiz 01009, Spain; Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Araba University Hospital, Jose Atxotegi, Vitoria-Gasteiz 01009, Spain.

Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Jose Atxotegi, Vitoria-Gasteiz 01009, Spain; Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Araba University Hospital, Jose Atxotegi, Vitoria-Gasteiz 01009, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;247:108644. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108644. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Detecting pain in sedated critically ill patients requires utmost attention.

AIM

To assess the pain in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), Behavioral Indicators Pain Scale (ESCID), the pupillary dilation response (PDR), and vital signs.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study METHODS: The study was conducted between March and December 2019, involving patients with a baseline BPS of 3, ESCID of 0, and RASS between -1 and -4. Patients with mobility limitations or altered pupillary reflexes were excluded. We measured before and after non-painful stimulation (NP) followed by 10-20-30-40 mA stimuli and endotracheal aspirate (ETA). The primary outcome was the pain measured with BPS and ESCID scales and PDR with AlgiScan® pupilometer defined as BPS≥4, ESCID≥1, and PDR≥11,5 %. We performed a descriptive study and analyzed the agreement between pain detection methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included, and 183 measurements were recorded. The scales showed minimal changes. Approximately 30 % of patients reported pain at a 30 mA stimulus, increasing to over 70 % after ETA. The PDR ranged from 2 % to 6-33% on the ETA, even in pain-free patients, with pain incidence between 70 % and 100 % for the 40 mA and ETA stimuli. Vital signs did not show relevant changes. The PDR had over 90 % agreement with scales for no pain. For higher-intensity stimuli, agreement ranged from 60 % to 80 %. Disagreement occurred when there was no pain by scales (BPS<4; ESCID<1) and pain with PDR (PDR≥11.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain behavioral scores and vital signs were low in critically ill patients. PDR detected a nociceptive pain response in no-pain patients.

摘要

背景

在镇静状态下的危重症患者中,疼痛的检测需要格外注意。

目的

使用行为疼痛量表(BPS)、行为疼痛指标量表(ESCID)、瞳孔扩张反应(PDR)和生命体征评估机械通气的危重症患者的疼痛情况。

设计

横断面研究

方法

该研究于 2019 年 3 月至 12 月进行,纳入基线 BPS 为 3、ESCID 为 0、RASS 为-1 至-4 的患者。排除有运动障碍或瞳孔反射改变的患者。我们在非疼痛刺激(NP)前后测量,并随后进行 10-20-30-40 mA 刺激和经气管抽吸(ETA)。主要结局是使用 BPS 和 ESCID 量表以及 AlgiScan®瞳孔计测量的 PDR,定义为 BPS≥4、ESCID≥1 和 PDR≥11.5%。我们进行了描述性研究,并分析了疼痛检测方法之间的一致性。

结果

共纳入 31 例患者,记录了 183 次测量。量表显示出最小的变化。大约 30%的患者在 30 mA 刺激时报告疼痛,在 ETA 后增加到 70%以上。PDR 在 ETA 时的范围为 2%至 6-33%,即使在无痛患者中也是如此,对于 40 mA 和 ETA 刺激,疼痛发生率为 70%至 100%。生命体征无明显变化。PDR 与无疼痛的量表之间有超过 90%的一致性。对于更高强度的刺激,一致性在 60%至 80%之间。当量表无疼痛(BPS<4;ESCID<1)且 PDR 有疼痛(PDR≥11.5)时,会出现不一致的情况。

结论

危重症患者的行为疼痛评分和生命体征较低。PDR 在无痛患者中检测到伤害性疼痛反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验