Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital, Respiratory Service, Galdakao, Spain.
BioBizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Age Ageing. 2024 Nov 1;53(11). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae251.
The effectiveness of booster bivalent vaccines against the Omicron variant, particularly amongst older patients, remains uncertain.
We sought to compare the relative effectiveness of a fourth dose of vaccine using bivalent messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), by comparing patients who had and had not received this dose.
We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study to assess the risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death of people aged >60 years with four doses as compared to those with only three doses. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We adjusted by age, sex, nursing-home, comorbidities, primary care setting and previous episodes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. We also investigated the impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection within each cohort, using the same methodology.
The administration of a fourth bivalent mRNA vaccine dose conferred significant additional protection against COVID-19 infection (HR: 0.479; 95% CI: 0.454-0.506), hospitalization (HR: 0.393; 95% CI: 0.348-0.443) and 30-day mortality (HR: 0.234; 95% CI: 0.171-0.318), as compared to individuals who had received only a third monovalent vaccine dose. In both cohorts, a prior history of COVID-19 infection involves lower risk of COVID-infection, hospitalization and death.
During the period of Omicron predominance, receiving a bivalent booster vaccine as a fourth dose, as compared to receiving only three doses of a monovalent mRNA vaccine, provides significant extra protection against COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and mortality. Antecedents of SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination involves a notable reduction in the above COVID-19 outcomes.
奥密克戎变异株流行期间,二价疫苗加强针对老年人等人群的有效性仍不确定。
我们旨在比较接种与未接种第四剂二价信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗人群的新冠病毒感染、住院和死亡风险,以评估第四剂疫苗的相对有效性。
我们开展了一项匹配的回顾性队列研究,比较了接种四剂与接种三剂疫苗的年龄>60 岁人群的新冠感染、住院和死亡风险。采用 Cox 比例风险回归模型,估计调整后的风险比(HR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。通过年龄、性别、疗养院、合并症、初级保健环境和既往严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的严重程度进行调整。我们还使用相同的方法,在每个队列中调查了既往 SARS-CoV-2 感染的影响。
与接种三剂单价疫苗相比,接种第四剂二价 mRNA 疫苗可显著降低新冠感染(HR:0.479;95%CI:0.454-0.506)、住院(HR:0.393;95%CI:0.348-0.443)和 30 天死亡率(HR:0.234;95%CI:0.171-0.318)风险。在两个队列中,既往新冠感染史与新冠感染、住院和死亡风险降低有关。
在奥密克戎流行期间,与接种三剂单价 mRNA 疫苗相比,接种第四剂二价疫苗可显著降低新冠感染、住院和死亡风险。接种疫苗前感染 SARS-CoV-2 可显著降低上述新冠结局风险。