• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术治疗与新辅助放化疗后手术治疗 T2N0M0 期食管鳞癌患者的比较。

Surgery alone versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangbin Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530000, Guangxi, P.R. China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, P.R. China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):28898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80653-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-80653-2
PMID:39572671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11582599/
Abstract

To compare the survival outcomes of patients with stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer treated with surgery alone versus those treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Patients with stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer, who either underwent surgery alone or received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database covering the period from 2000 to 2020. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) between the two treatment groups were compared. A total of 583 patients were included: 267 (45.8%) received surgery alone, while 316 (54.2%) underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Prior to propensity score matching, no significant differences were observed between the surgery alone and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy groups in terms of 5-year CSS (60.86% vs. 59.02%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-1.29; P = 0.916) and OS (50.64% vs. 49.81%; HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75-1.12; P = 0.375). After propensity score matching, the 5-year CSS (66.43% vs. 56.67%; HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.89-1.64; P = 0.225) and OS (56.49% vs. 47.37%; HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.85-1.40; P = 0.481) remained statistically similar between the two groups. Subgroup analyses of patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma revealed no significant differences in survival outcomes between the treatment modalities for either histological subtype. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery does not confer a survival advantage over surgery alone in patients with stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer, irrespective of histological subtype.

摘要

比较单独手术治疗与新辅助放化疗后手术治疗 T2N0M0 期食管鳞癌患者的生存结局。从 2000 年至 2020 年期间的监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中提取接受单纯手术或新辅助放化疗后手术的 T2N0M0 期食管鳞癌患者。比较两组间的癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)。共纳入 583 例患者:267 例(45.8%)接受单纯手术,316 例(54.2%)接受新辅助放化疗后手术。在进行倾向评分匹配之前,单纯手术组和新辅助放化疗组在 5 年 CSS(60.86%比 59.02%;风险比[HR] = 1.01,95%置信区间[CI]:0.79-1.29;P = 0.916)和 OS(50.64%比 49.81%;HR = 0.91,95% CI:0.75-1.12;P = 0.375)方面无显著差异。在进行倾向评分匹配后,5 年 CSS(66.43%比 56.67%;HR = 1.21,95% CI:0.89-1.64;P = 0.225)和 OS(56.49%比 47.37%;HR = 1.09,95% CI:0.85-1.40;P = 0.481)在两组间仍具有统计学相似性。对鳞癌和腺癌患者的亚组分析显示,两种治疗方式在任何组织学亚型的生存结局方面均无显著差异。对于 T2N0M0 期食管鳞癌患者,新辅助放化疗后手术与单纯手术相比并不能带来生存优势,无论组织学亚型如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51ed/11582599/a8808469a2de/41598_2024_80653_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51ed/11582599/40fe7588bd78/41598_2024_80653_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51ed/11582599/67b9b40bece3/41598_2024_80653_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51ed/11582599/a8808469a2de/41598_2024_80653_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51ed/11582599/40fe7588bd78/41598_2024_80653_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51ed/11582599/67b9b40bece3/41598_2024_80653_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51ed/11582599/a8808469a2de/41598_2024_80653_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgery alone versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer.手术治疗与新辅助放化疗后手术治疗 T2N0M0 期食管鳞癌患者的比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):28898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80653-2.
2
Causes of death in locally advanced esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.
Dis Esophagus. 2025 Mar 3;38(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaf017.
3
Role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in clinical T2N0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based cohort study.新辅助放化疗在临床 T2N0M0 食管癌中的作用:基于人群的队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;44(5):620-625. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Is postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy necessary for patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? An analysis based on the SEER database.新辅助放化疗后食管癌患者是否需要术后辅助放疗?基于 SEER 数据库的分析。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Aug;45(9):900-910. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.9.20240045.
5
Adjuvant treatment patterns for pT3N0M0 esophageal cancer undergoing surgery.术后 pT3N0M0 食管癌的辅助治疗模式。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Jul 31;37(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae026.
6
Treatment patterns and survival in T4b esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.T4b 期食管癌的治疗模式和生存情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
Aging (Albany NY). 2024 Apr 18;16(8):7131-7140. doi: 10.18632/aging.205747.
7
Role of neoadjuvant treatment in clinical T2N0M0 oesophageal cancer: results from a retrospective multi-center European study.新辅助治疗在临床T2N0M0期食管癌中的作用:一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究的结果
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Mar;56:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.024. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
8
Association Between Clinically Staged Node-Negative Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Overall Survival Benefit From Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.临床分期为淋巴结阴性的食管腺癌与新辅助放化疗带来的总生存获益之间的关联
JAMA Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):234-45. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4068.
9
Comparison of pathologic response and survival outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.新辅助放化疗与新辅助免疫化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌患者的病理反应和生存结局比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 5;24(1):1228. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12946-8.
10
Low- vs. High-Dose Neoadjuvant Radiation in Trimodality Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.低剂量与高剂量新辅助放疗在局部进展期食管癌三联治疗中的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 May;23(5):885-894. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4007-3. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Advances in diagnosis and management of cancer of the esophagus.食管癌的诊断与治疗进展。
BMJ. 2024 Jun 3;385:e074962. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074962.
2
Esophageal cancer in China: Practice and research in the new era.中国食管癌:新时代的实践与研究。
Int J Cancer. 2023 May 1;152(9):1741-1751. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34301. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
3
Long-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The NEOCRTEC5010 Randomized Clinical Trial.
新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌的长期疗效:NEOCRTEC5010 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):721-729. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2373.
4
Optimal Treatment of cT2N0 Esophageal Carcinoma: Is Upfront Surgery Really the Way?cT2N0 期食管鳞癌的最佳治疗策略:前路手术真的是首选吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8387-8397. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10194-9. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗食管癌的 10 年结果:随机对照 CROSS 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun 20;39(18):1995-2004. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03614. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
6
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
Clinicopathologic factors associated with pathologic upstaging in patients clinically diagnosed stage T2N0M0 squamous cell esophageal carcinoma.临床诊断为T2N0M0期鳞状细胞食管癌患者中与病理分期上调相关的临床病理因素。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Sep;16(5):1106-1111. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1171_19.
8
Induction therapy for clinical stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.临床分期为T2N0M0食管癌的诱导治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(40):e12651. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012651.
9
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术对比单纯手术治疗局部进展期食管鳞癌(NEOCRTEC5010):一项 III 期、多中心、随机、开放标签临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2796-2803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
10
Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of T2N0 esophageal cancer treatment options.新辅助治疗还是 upfront 手术?T2N0 食管癌治疗选择的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.053. Epub 2018 May 3.