Suppr超能文献

超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与椎旁阻滞在改良根治术后急性和慢性乳腺癌术后疼痛中的比较:随机对照试验。

Comparison between ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block and paravertebral block on acute and chronic post mastectomy pain after modified radical mastectomy: randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management Department, South Egypt Cancer institute, Assiut university, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02810-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inadequate acute postoperative pain management is linked to the effect on the stress response and development of chronic pain. A unique regional anaesthetic method that is becoming more important for postoperative pain management is erector spinea plane block (ESP). Since its initial description, physicians have questioned weather this novel easy method can take the place of paravertebral block (PVB). Our goal was to evaluate, in contrast to control group, the effects of ESP & PVB on acute and chronic post-mastectomy pain.

METHODS

One hundred and five female patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy participated in this study, randomly allocated into three equal groups: erector spinae plane block (ESP), thoracic paravertebral (TPV), and control groups. Both blocks were ultrasound-guided with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine according to patients' group, control group was administered standard general anaesthesia without intervention. Total morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperative was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were time to the first analgesia, (Visual Analogue Scale)VAS score, serum level of cortisol and prolactin, sedation score, side effects, and LANSS scores in the first, third, and sixth postoperative months were among the variables compared between groups.

RESULTS

Total morphine consumption in the first 24 h was significantly higher in control than ESP and TPV groups (10.74 ± 1.37, 8.17 ± 1.69, 5.70 ± 1.95 respectively p < 0.001). Time to first analgesic request was the shortest in control versus ESP and TPV groups as (4.37 ± 3.06, 8.13 ± 1.75, 10.64 ± 1.83 h respectively p ˂0.001). ESP and TPV had significantly lower cortisol and prolactin levels compared to control (p < 0.001). The highest LANSS scores were in the control group in the first, third, and sixth months compared with ESP and TPV, with no significant difference between ESP and TPV.

CONCLUSION

ESP and TPV blocks provided superior early postoperative analgesia and reduced stress response compared to the control group in female patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. PVB is better than ESB in acute postoperative pain management (the total morphine consumption VAS score and time of first analgesic request). Both techniques showed better long-term outcomes compared to the control group regarding LANSS score in the 6-month follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov trial registry (identifier NCT04498234 on 04/08/2020).

摘要

背景

术后急性疼痛管理不足与应激反应的影响和慢性疼痛的发展有关。一种新的区域麻醉方法,即竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESP),在术后疼痛管理中变得越来越重要。自最初描述以来,医生们一直在质疑这种新型简单的方法是否可以替代椎旁阻滞(PVB)。我们的目标是评估 ESP 和 PVB 对改良根治性乳腺癌术后急性和慢性疼痛的影响,并与对照组进行比较。

方法

105 例女性改良根治性乳腺癌患者参与了本研究,随机分为三组:竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESP)组、胸椎旁阻滞(TPV)组和对照组。两组均采用超声引导,每侧注射 20ml0.25%布比卡因。对照组给予标准全身麻醉,不干预。术后 24 小时内总吗啡消耗量为主要观察指标。次要观察指标包括首次镇痛时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、皮质醇和催乳素血清水平、镇静评分、副作用以及术后第 1、3、6 个月的 LANSS 评分。

结果

对照组术后 24 小时内吗啡总消耗量明显高于 ESP 组和 TPV 组(分别为 10.74±1.37、8.17±1.69 和 5.70±1.95,p<0.001)。对照组首次镇痛需求时间最短(4.37±3.06、8.13±1.75 和 10.64±1.83 小时,p<0.001)。ESP 和 TPV 组的皮质醇和催乳素水平明显低于对照组(p<0.001)。对照组在第 1、3 和 6 个月的 LANSS 评分最高,与 ESP 和 TPV 组相比差异有统计学意义,但 ESP 和 TPV 组之间差异无统计学意义。

结论

与对照组相比,改良根治性乳腺癌术后女性患者行 ESP 和 TPV 阻滞可提供更好的早期术后镇痛效果和减轻应激反应。与 ESB 相比,PVB 更能改善急性术后疼痛管理(总吗啡消耗量、首次镇痛请求时间)。与对照组相比,两种技术在 6 个月随访时 LANSS 评分方面的长期结果更好。

临床试验注册

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。注册号:NCT04498234(2020 年 8 月 4 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d155/11580581/74b498467122/12871_2024_2810_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验