Suppr超能文献

竖脊肌平面阻滞和胸椎旁神经阻滞与 IV 吗啡用于乳腺癌手术的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kocaeli University Hospital, 41380 Kocaeli, Turkey.

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kocaeli University Hospital, 41380 Kocaeli, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2020 Feb;59:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a novel regional anesthesia technique and gaining importance for postoperative pain management. Since it was first described, the clinicians wonder if this new simple technique can replace paravertebral block (PVB). We aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of ESP block and PVB with a control group in breast surgeries.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Operating room.

PATIENTS

Seventy-five ASA I-II patients aged 25-65, who were scheduled to go under elective unilateral breast surgery for breast cancer were included to the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized into three groups as ESP, PVB, and Control group. Ultrasound (US) guided ESP block and PVB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine was done preoperatively to the patients according to their groups.

MEASUREMENTS

All patients were provided with iv patient-controlled analgesia device for postoperative analgesia. Morphine consumptions and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for pain were recorded at 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th hours postoperatively.

MAIN RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between ESP and Control groups (p < 0,001) and between PVB and Control groups (p < 0,001), while there was no difference between ESP and PVB groups (p > 0,05) for 24-hour morphine consumptions. There was a significant difference between PVB and Control groups for NRS at postoperative 1st and 6th hour (p = 0.018 and p = 0.027 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that US guided ESP block and PVB provided adequate analgesia in patients undergoing breast surgery and have an opioid sparing effect by reducing morphine consumption. Clinical Trials Registry: NCT03480958.

摘要

研究目的

竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞是一种新的区域麻醉技术,在术后疼痛管理中越来越受到重视。自从首次描述以来,临床医生想知道这种新的简单技术是否可以替代椎旁阻滞(PVB)。我们旨在比较 ESP 阻滞和 PVB 与对照组在乳房手术中的术后镇痛效果。

设计

随机对照试验。

设置

手术室。

患者

75 名 ASA I-II 级年龄在 25-65 岁之间的患者,计划接受单侧择期乳腺癌手术,纳入本研究。

干预

患者随机分为三组,即 ESP 组、PVB 组和对照组。根据组别的不同,对患者进行超声(US)引导的 ESP 阻滞和 PVB,阻滞用 20ml0.25%布比卡因。

测量

所有患者均使用静脉自控镇痛装置进行术后镇痛。记录术后第 1、6、12 和 24 小时的吗啡用量和疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)评分。

主要结果

ESP 组和对照组之间(p<0.001)以及 PVB 组和对照组之间(p<0.001)有统计学差异,而 ESP 组和 PVB 组之间(p>0.05)24 小时吗啡用量无差异。PVB 组与对照组在术后第 1 小时和第 6 小时的 NRS 评分有显著差异(p=0.018 和 p=0.027)。

结论

本研究表明,超声引导的 ESP 阻滞和 PVB 可在接受乳房手术的患者中提供充分的镇痛,并通过减少吗啡用量产生阿片类药物节约效应。临床试验注册号:NCT03480958。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验