• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英格兰引入“软性”默认同意制度前后,与已故器官捐赠相关的公众态度、偏好和自我报告行为的亚组差异:混合方法研究。

Subgroup differences in public attitudes, preferences and self-reported behaviour related to deceased organ donation before and after the introduction of the 'soft' opt-out consent system in England: mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):1447. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3
PMID:39574144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11580530/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the UK, over 7,000 people are on the waiting list for an organ transplant and there are inequalities in need, access and waiting time for organs, with notable differences between minority ethnic groups. In May 2020, England changed the law and introduced a 'soft' opt-out system of consent to organ donation with a view to increase consent rates. We aimed to learn more about the impact of the law change on attitudes and views likely to be relevant to consent to deceased organ donation between different population subgroups.

METHODS

Mixed-methods design involving latent class analysis of data from twelve repeated cross-sectional surveys undertaken from 2015 to 2021 (n = 19,011); analysis of the law change survey dataset collected quarterly from 2018 to 2022 (n = 45,439); and interviews with purposively selected members of the public (n = 30) with a focus on minority perspectives.

RESULTS

Support for the principle of deceased organ donation remained high and stable in the general population (80%) but was 20% lower among ethnic minorities. From 2018 to 2022, an average of 58% of the general population was aware of the law change; this was lower among minority ethnic groups (31%). We identified four population subgroups (supportive donors (24% of the population); unengaged donors (22%); uncommitted donors (46%); and unsupportive donors (9%)). Interview themes included the challenges of discussing organ donation decisions, balancing autonomy with respecting family relationships, targeted misinformation, frustrations at the lack of consensus between community leaders, limited understanding of what happens during the end-of-life care leading to organ donation, and how this aligns with cultural values and preferences.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the law change has not been associated to date with any change in public attitudes and preferences likely to influence consent overall or in minority ethnic groups in England. Uncommitted donors may benefit from encouragement to express their organ donation decision, and unengaged donors from attempts to address mis/information, confusion, and uncertainty. Interventions to raise the consent rate need to take account of the significant role of the family as well as wider community influences on attitudes, preferences and decision-making, particularly among certain minority (ethnic) groups.

摘要

背景

在英国,有超过 7000 人在等待器官移植,而在器官需求、获取和等待时间方面存在不平等现象,少数民族群体之间存在显著差异。2020 年 5 月,英国修改法律,引入了一种“软性”默认同意器官捐献的制度,旨在提高同意率。我们旨在了解更多关于法律变更对不同人群亚组中与已故器官捐献同意相关的态度和观点的影响。

方法

混合方法设计,包括 2015 年至 2021 年进行的 12 次重复横断面调查数据的潜在类别分析(n=19011);2018 年至 2022 年每季度收集的法律变更调查数据集的分析(n=45439);以及重点关注少数民族观点的有针对性选择的公众(n=30)的访谈。

结果

在普通人群中,对已故器官捐献原则的支持仍然很高且稳定(80%),但少数民族群体的支持率低 20%。从 2018 年到 2022 年,普通人群中平均有 58%的人了解法律变更;少数民族群体中这一比例较低(31%)。我们确定了四个人群亚组(支持性捐献者(占人口的 24%);不参与的捐献者(22%);未承诺的捐献者(46%);不支持的捐献者(9%))。访谈主题包括讨论器官捐献决策的挑战、平衡自主权与尊重家庭关系、有针对性的错误信息、对社区领袖之间缺乏共识的挫败感、对导致器官捐献的临终关怀期间发生的事情的理解有限,以及这如何与文化价值观和偏好相一致。

结论

到目前为止,法律变更的实施并未导致公众态度和偏好发生任何变化,这些变化可能会影响总体同意率或英格兰少数民族群体的同意率。未承诺的捐献者可能受益于鼓励表达他们的器官捐献决定,而不参与的捐献者可能受益于尝试解决错误/信息、困惑和不确定性。提高同意率的干预措施需要考虑到家庭以及更广泛的社区对态度、偏好和决策的重要影响,特别是在某些少数民族(族裔)群体中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/7c9e4393acf2/12913_2024_11821_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/1f48e4af224a/12913_2024_11821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/931842fc610c/12913_2024_11821_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/9e8e0a26621a/12913_2024_11821_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/8a04d2431de4/12913_2024_11821_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/1cd13e97629f/12913_2024_11821_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/06d613e6598d/12913_2024_11821_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/7c9e4393acf2/12913_2024_11821_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/1f48e4af224a/12913_2024_11821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/931842fc610c/12913_2024_11821_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/9e8e0a26621a/12913_2024_11821_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/8a04d2431de4/12913_2024_11821_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/1cd13e97629f/12913_2024_11821_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/06d613e6598d/12913_2024_11821_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/7c9e4393acf2/12913_2024_11821_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Subgroup differences in public attitudes, preferences and self-reported behaviour related to deceased organ donation before and after the introduction of the 'soft' opt-out consent system in England: mixed-methods study.在英格兰引入“软性”默认同意制度前后,与已故器官捐赠相关的公众态度、偏好和自我报告行为的亚组差异:混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):1447. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3.
2
Potential donor family behaviours, experiences and decisions following implementation of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019 in England: A qualitative study.英国2019年《器官捐赠(推定同意)法案》实施后潜在捐赠者家属的行为、经历及决策:一项定性研究
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Feb;86:103816. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103816. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
3
'What if I'm not dead?' - Myth-busting and organ donation.“如果我没有死呢?”——破除关于器官捐赠的谣言。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):141-158. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12344. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
4
Analysis of content and online public responses to media articles that raise awareness of the opt-out system of consent to organ donation in England.分析提高公众对英格兰默认器官捐献同意制度的媒体文章的内容和在线公众反应。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;10:1067635. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1067635. eCollection 2022.
5
Analysis of Attitudes Towards Opt-Out Organ Donation Consent: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Saudi Arabian Residents.对退出式器官捐赠同意态度的分析:沙特阿拉伯居民的横断面研究
Transplant Proc. 2024 Nov;56(9):1916-1921. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.007. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
6
The effect on consent rates for deceased organ donation in Wales after the introduction of an opt-out system.在引入默认捐献制度后,威尔士对已故器官捐献同意率的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Sep;75(9):1146-1152. doi: 10.1111/anae.15055. Epub 2020 May 5.
7
Short-term impact of introducing a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales: before and after study.威尔士引入软性自愿器官捐献制度的短期影响:前后研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e025159. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025159.
8
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.对已故器官捐赠的推定同意系统的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(26):iii, ix-xi, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta13260.
9
Why did England change its law on deceased organ donation in 2019? The dynamic interplay between evidence and values.2019 年,英国为何修改了关于已故者器官捐赠的法律?证据与价值观的动态相互作用。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2024 Jul;19(3):353-369. doi: 10.1017/S1744133124000112. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
10
Ethical, Psychological and Social Un/certainties in the Face of Deemed Consent for Organ Donation in England.面对英国推定同意器官捐赠中的伦理、心理和社会不确定性。
Health Care Anal. 2024 Dec;32(4):272-289. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00492-0. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential donor family behaviours, experiences and decisions following implementation of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019 in England: A qualitative study.英国2019年《器官捐赠(推定同意)法案》实施后潜在捐赠者家属的行为、经历及决策:一项定性研究
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Feb;86:103816. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103816. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Attitudes of European students towards family decision-making and the harmonisation of consent systems in deceased organ donation: a cross-national survey.欧洲学生对家庭决策的态度以及在已故器官捐献中同意制度的协调:一项跨国调查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;22(1):2080. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14476-z.
3
Ethnic inequalities in health-related quality of life among older adults in England: secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional survey.
英格兰老年人健康相关生活质量的种族不平等:一项全国性横断面调查的二次分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e145-e154. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30287-5. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
4
Using discrete choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions.运用离散选择实验来衡量对难以观察的选择属性的偏好,以为卫生政策决策提供信息。
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Jun 11;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00276-x.
5
Religious and Cultural Aspects of Organ Donation in the Turkish Population.土耳其人口中器官捐赠的宗教和文化方面
Transplant Proc. 2019 Sep;51(7):2158-2162. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.159. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Cultural barriers to organ donation among Chinese and Korean individuals in the United States: a systematic review.中美两国的华裔和韩裔人群器官捐赠的文化障碍:一项系统性综述。
Transpl Int. 2019 Oct;32(10):1001-1018. doi: 10.1111/tri.13439. Epub 2019 May 22.
7
Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods.综合定量和定性证据以为复杂干预措施指南提供信息:阐明目的、设计并概述一些方法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000893. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893. eCollection 2019.
8
Factors influencing the family consent rate for organ donation in the UK.影响英国器官捐献家庭同意率的因素。
Anaesthesia. 2016 Sep;71(9):1053-63. doi: 10.1111/anae.13535. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
9
From motivation to acceptability: a survey of public attitudes towards organ donation in Denmark.从动机到可接受性:丹麦公众对器官捐赠态度的调查
Transplant Res. 2016 May 23;5:5. doi: 10.1186/s13737-016-0035-2. eCollection 2016.
10
Is decedent race an independent predictor of organ donor consent or merely a surrogate marker of socioeconomic status?死者的种族是否是器官捐献者同意的独立预测因素,还是仅仅是社会经济地位的替代指标?
Transplantation. 2012 Oct 27;94(8):873-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31826604d5.