Suppr超能文献

在英格兰引入“软性”默认同意制度前后,与已故器官捐赠相关的公众态度、偏好和自我报告行为的亚组差异:混合方法研究。

Subgroup differences in public attitudes, preferences and self-reported behaviour related to deceased organ donation before and after the introduction of the 'soft' opt-out consent system in England: mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):1447. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the UK, over 7,000 people are on the waiting list for an organ transplant and there are inequalities in need, access and waiting time for organs, with notable differences between minority ethnic groups. In May 2020, England changed the law and introduced a 'soft' opt-out system of consent to organ donation with a view to increase consent rates. We aimed to learn more about the impact of the law change on attitudes and views likely to be relevant to consent to deceased organ donation between different population subgroups.

METHODS

Mixed-methods design involving latent class analysis of data from twelve repeated cross-sectional surveys undertaken from 2015 to 2021 (n = 19,011); analysis of the law change survey dataset collected quarterly from 2018 to 2022 (n = 45,439); and interviews with purposively selected members of the public (n = 30) with a focus on minority perspectives.

RESULTS

Support for the principle of deceased organ donation remained high and stable in the general population (80%) but was 20% lower among ethnic minorities. From 2018 to 2022, an average of 58% of the general population was aware of the law change; this was lower among minority ethnic groups (31%). We identified four population subgroups (supportive donors (24% of the population); unengaged donors (22%); uncommitted donors (46%); and unsupportive donors (9%)). Interview themes included the challenges of discussing organ donation decisions, balancing autonomy with respecting family relationships, targeted misinformation, frustrations at the lack of consensus between community leaders, limited understanding of what happens during the end-of-life care leading to organ donation, and how this aligns with cultural values and preferences.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the law change has not been associated to date with any change in public attitudes and preferences likely to influence consent overall or in minority ethnic groups in England. Uncommitted donors may benefit from encouragement to express their organ donation decision, and unengaged donors from attempts to address mis/information, confusion, and uncertainty. Interventions to raise the consent rate need to take account of the significant role of the family as well as wider community influences on attitudes, preferences and decision-making, particularly among certain minority (ethnic) groups.

摘要

背景

在英国,有超过 7000 人在等待器官移植,而在器官需求、获取和等待时间方面存在不平等现象,少数民族群体之间存在显著差异。2020 年 5 月,英国修改法律,引入了一种“软性”默认同意器官捐献的制度,旨在提高同意率。我们旨在了解更多关于法律变更对不同人群亚组中与已故器官捐献同意相关的态度和观点的影响。

方法

混合方法设计,包括 2015 年至 2021 年进行的 12 次重复横断面调查数据的潜在类别分析(n=19011);2018 年至 2022 年每季度收集的法律变更调查数据集的分析(n=45439);以及重点关注少数民族观点的有针对性选择的公众(n=30)的访谈。

结果

在普通人群中,对已故器官捐献原则的支持仍然很高且稳定(80%),但少数民族群体的支持率低 20%。从 2018 年到 2022 年,普通人群中平均有 58%的人了解法律变更;少数民族群体中这一比例较低(31%)。我们确定了四个人群亚组(支持性捐献者(占人口的 24%);不参与的捐献者(22%);未承诺的捐献者(46%);不支持的捐献者(9%))。访谈主题包括讨论器官捐献决策的挑战、平衡自主权与尊重家庭关系、有针对性的错误信息、对社区领袖之间缺乏共识的挫败感、对导致器官捐献的临终关怀期间发生的事情的理解有限,以及这如何与文化价值观和偏好相一致。

结论

到目前为止,法律变更的实施并未导致公众态度和偏好发生任何变化,这些变化可能会影响总体同意率或英格兰少数民族群体的同意率。未承诺的捐献者可能受益于鼓励表达他们的器官捐献决定,而不参与的捐献者可能受益于尝试解决错误/信息、困惑和不确定性。提高同意率的干预措施需要考虑到家庭以及更广泛的社区对态度、偏好和决策的重要影响,特别是在某些少数民族(族裔)群体中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5595/11580530/1f48e4af224a/12913_2024_11821_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验