Dr James Fletcher, Postal address: Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital. 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia. Email address:
J Frailty Aging. 2024;13(4):487-494. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2024.22.
Frailty is an indicator of individual vulnerability and differentiates health status among people of the same chronological age.
This study aimed to determine whether baseline frailty index (FI) was associated with systemic anticancer therapy treatment outcomes in older adults with solid cancers.
Retrospective cohort study.
Major metropolitan outpatient oncology service.
Adults aged over 65 years with a solid malignancy who had been referred for consideration of systemic therapy, and had completed a baseline frailty assessment between January 2019 and July 2021.
Frailty had been prospectively assessed with a 58-item FI derived from a geriatric oncology nurse assessment prior to initial oncologist appointments. Primary outcome was treatment completion, and secondary outcomes included incidence of high-grade treatment-related toxicity or unplanned hospital admissions, and survival outcomes. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to test the association between treatment outcomes and baseline FI. Co-variates included age, sex, performance status, treatment intent, and stage. Kaplan-Meier and cox proportional hazard analysis were conducted for survival analysis.
The median FI (IQR) was 0.24 (0.15-0.31) and 43% were frail (FI>0.25). FI was positively correlated with ECOG, however 28% of ECOG 0-1 were frail. In multivariable regression analyses, each 0.10 increase in FI was associated with an increased likelihood of not completing or not receiving treatment (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.84; p=.04), treatment-related toxicity (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.23; p<.01) and unplanned hospital admissions (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.16-2.25; p<.01). Frail patients had increased mortality (adjusted HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.42-5.56; p<.01). Age did not predict treatment completion, toxicities, or survival.
Baseline FI is a granular measure that can help to identify frailer older patients who are more likely to require tailored therapy and support, and less frail older patients who are more likely to tolerate treatment.
虚弱是个体脆弱性的指标,可区分同一年龄段人群的健康状况。
本研究旨在确定基线虚弱指数(FI)是否与老年实体瘤患者的系统性抗癌治疗结局相关。
回顾性队列研究。
主要大都市门诊肿瘤服务。
年龄在 65 岁以上、患有实体恶性肿瘤且已被转介考虑接受系统性治疗的成年人,并在 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月期间完成基线虚弱评估。
在首次肿瘤学家就诊前,通过老年肿瘤护士评估得出 58 项 FI 来前瞻性评估虚弱情况。主要结局是治疗完成情况,次要结局包括高级别治疗相关毒性或计划外住院发生率和生存结局。进行单变量和多变量回归分析以检验治疗结局与基线 FI 之间的关联。协变量包括年龄、性别、表现状态、治疗意图和分期。进行 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 比例风险分析以进行生存分析。
FI 的中位数(IQR)为 0.24(0.15-0.31),43%的患者虚弱(FI>0.25)。FI 与 ECOG 呈正相关,然而,28%的 ECOG 0-1 患者虚弱。在多变量回归分析中,FI 每增加 0.10,未完成或未接受治疗的可能性增加(OR 1.37,95%CI 1.02-1.84;p=.04)、治疗相关毒性(OR 1.60,95%CI 1.14-2.23;p<.01)和计划外住院(OR 1.61;95%CI 1.16-2.25;p<.01)。虚弱患者的死亡率增加(调整后的 HR 2.81,95%CI 1.42-5.56;p<.01)。年龄不能预测治疗完成、毒性或生存。
基线 FI 是一种粒度测量指标,可帮助识别更脆弱的老年患者,他们更有可能需要量身定制的治疗和支持,以及不太脆弱的老年患者,他们更有可能耐受治疗。