• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的性别差异

Sex related disparities after complex percutaneous coronary interventions.

作者信息

Alperi Alberto, Almendárez Marcel, Pascual Isaac, Alvarez Rut, Betanzos Jose Luis, Hernández-Vaquero Daniel, Ptaszynski Raul, Ortiz Juan Francisco, Moris Cesar, Avanzas Pablo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Heart Area, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.

Department of Cardiology, Health Research Institute of Asturias (Instituto de Iinvestigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias), Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 7;11:1382585. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1382585. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1382585
PMID:39574779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11578988/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Complex Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of ischemic heart disease has increased significantly. We aimed to evaluate sex-related differences in patients undergoing complex PCI.

METHODS

single-center prospective observational study including patients undergoing complex PCI between 2017 and 2023. Baseline and procedural features, and mid-term outcomes were compared according to the gender distribution. The combined primary endpoint included stroke, myocardial infarction, need for a new coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality. Propensity score (PS) matching with an inverse probability of treatment weight (IPW) approach was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

1,283 patients were included, 983 (76.6%) male and 300 (23.4%) female. Median follow-up was 2.4 (IQR: 1-3.8) years. There was a higher rate of no-reflow phenomenon (4% vs. 1.8%,  = 0.03) among female patients. In the overall cohort, female patients had a greater risk for the combined primary endpoint (HR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02-1.59). In the matched cohort, female patients exhibited a higher risk for the combined primary endpoint (HR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.42), as well as for myocardial infarction (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.03-1.75), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.45), and a trend towards a higher risk for the need of a new coronary revascularization (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.92-1.61).

CONCLUSIONS

in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing complex PCI procedures, female patients are associated with a higher risk of early complications.

摘要

引言

用于治疗缺血性心脏病的复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)显著增加。我们旨在评估接受复杂PCI患者的性别差异。

方法

单中心前瞻性观察性研究,纳入2017年至2023年间接受复杂PCI的患者。根据性别分布比较基线和手术特征以及中期结局。联合主要终点包括中风、心肌梗死、需要进行新的冠状动脉血运重建以及全因死亡率。采用倾向评分(PS)匹配和治疗权重逆概率(IPW)方法来调整基线特征的差异。

结果

共纳入1283例患者,其中男性983例(76.6%),女性300例(23.4%)。中位随访时间为2.4年(四分位间距:1 - 3.8年)。女性患者无复流现象发生率较高(4%对1.8%,P = 0.03)。在整个队列中,女性患者发生联合主要终点的风险更高(风险比[HR] 1.28,95%置信区间[CI]:1.02 - 1.59)。在匹配队列中,女性患者发生联合主要终点的风险更高(HR 1.23,95% CI:1.06 - 1.42),心肌梗死风险(HR 1.34,95% CI 1.03 - 1.75)以及全因死亡率风险(HR 1.21,95% CI 1.02 - 1.45)也更高,并且有进行新的冠状动脉血运重建需求风险更高的趋势(HR 1.22,95% CI 0.92 - 1.61)。

结论

在当代接受复杂PCI手术的患者队列中,女性患者早期并发症风险较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e723/11578988/bafdb0099179/fcvm-11-1382585-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e723/11578988/ce713c7cb325/fcvm-11-1382585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e723/11578988/f8f77d0625b6/fcvm-11-1382585-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e723/11578988/d8219de5f453/fcvm-11-1382585-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e723/11578988/bafdb0099179/fcvm-11-1382585-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e723/11578988/ce713c7cb325/fcvm-11-1382585-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e723/11578988/f8f77d0625b6/fcvm-11-1382585-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e723/11578988/d8219de5f453/fcvm-11-1382585-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e723/11578988/bafdb0099179/fcvm-11-1382585-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex related disparities after complex percutaneous coronary interventions.复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的性别差异
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 7;11:1382585. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1382585. eCollection 2024.
2
Long-Term Outcomes of Complete Revascularization With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗完全血运重建的长期结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 13;13(13):1557-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.034.
3
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
4
Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室射血分数严重降低患者的长期预后
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):631-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0239.
5
Ischemia and Bleeding in Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的癌症患者的缺血与出血
JACC CardioOncol. 2019 Dec 17;1(2):145-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2019.11.001. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Staged complete revascularization or culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and diabetes.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并糖尿病患者多支冠状动脉病变行分期完全血运重建或罪犯血管单纯经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Sep 17;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0923-0.
7
[Efficacy comparison of 3 strategies for real-world stable coronary artery disease patients with three-vessel disease].[三种策略对真实世界中三支血管病变稳定型冠心病患者的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 24;45(12):1049-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.12.009.
8
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较:一项个体患者数据分析荟萃研究。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2247-2257. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02334-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
10
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.

本文引用的文献

1
Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Older Adults.老年患者复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 3;12(19):e029057. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029057. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
2
OCT or Angiography Guidance for PCI in Complex Bifurcation Lesions.OCT 或血管造影指导复杂分叉病变的 PCI
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1477-1487. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307770. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
3
Sex-based Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease.缺血性心脏病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的性别差异
Eur Cardiol. 2023 Mar 2;18:e06. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.24. eCollection 2023.
4
Intravascular Imaging-Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex PCI.血管内影像学指导或血管造影指导下的复杂 PCI。
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 4;388(18):1668-1679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216607. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
5
Procedural Outcomes in Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Interventions within Chronic Total Occlusions Stratified by Gender.按性别分层的慢性完全闭塞病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的手术结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 4;11(5):1419. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051419.
6
Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease.心血管疾病的社会决定因素。
Circ Res. 2022 Mar 4;130(5):782-799. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319811. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
7
Defining Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk: An Analysis of the United Kingdom BCIS Database 2006-2016.定义经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的复杂性和风险:对英国 BCIS 数据库 2006-2016 年的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.039.
8
Sex-related differences and rotational atherectomy: Analysis of 5 177 percutaneous coronary interventions based on a large national registry from 2014 to 2020.性别相关差异与旋磨术:基于 2014 年至 2020 年大型国家注册研究的 5177 例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的分析。
Kardiol Pol. 2021;79(12):1320-1327. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2021.0131. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
9
Comparative Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan and the United States, 2013 to 2017.2013 至 2017 年日本与美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的对比趋势。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 15;76(11):1328-1340. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.037.
10
Long-Term Outcomes in Women and Men Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后女性和男性的长期结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 14;75(14):1631-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.056.