Bezuidenhout Charl, Long Lawrence, Nichols Brooke, Meyer-Rath Gesine, Fox Matthew P, Olifant Sharon, Theron Grant, Fiphaza Kuhle, Ruhwald Morten, Penn-Nicholson Adam, Fourie Bernard, Medina-Marino Andrew
Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, U.S.
Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
medRxiv. 2024 Nov 2:2024.11.01.24316570. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.01.24316570.
Effective strategies are needed to facilitate early detection and diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). The overreliance on passive case detection, symptom screening, and collection of sputum, results in delayed or undiagnosed TB, which directly contributes to on-going TB transmission. We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of in-home, Targeted Universal TB Testing (TUTT) of household contacts using GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra at point-of-care (POC) during household contact investigations (HCIs) and compared the feasibility of using sputum vs. tongue swab specimens.
Household contacts (HHCs) receiving in-home POC TUTT as part of the TB Home Study were asked to complete a post-test acceptability survey. The survey explored HHC's level of comfort, confidence in the test results, and the perceived appropriateness of in-home POC TUTT. We used the Metrics to Assess the Feasibility of Rapid Point-of-Care Technologies framework to assess the feasibility of using sputum and tongue swab specimens for in-home POC TUTT. Descriptive statistics were used to report participant responses and feasibility metrics.
Of 313 eligible HHCs, 267/313 (85.3%) consented to in-home POC TUTT. Of those, 267/267 (100%) provided a tongue swab and 46/267 (17.2%) could expectorate sputum. All specimens were successfully prepared for immediate, in-home testing with Xpert Ultra on GeneXpert Edge. Of 164 tongue swab tests conducted, 160/164 (97.6%) generated a valid test result compared to 44/46 (95.7%) sputum-based tests. An immediate test result was available for 262/267 (98.1%) individuals based on in-home swab testing, and 44/46 (95.7%) based on in-home sputum testing. The mean in-home POC TUTT acceptability score (5=highly acceptable) was 4.5/5 (SD= 0.2).
In-home, POC TUTT using either sputum or tongue swab specimens was highly acceptable and feasible. Tongue swab specimens greatly increase the proportion of HHCs tested compared to sputum. In-home POC TUTT using a combination of sputum and tongue swabs can mitigate shortcomings to case detection.
需要有效的策略来促进结核病(TB)的早期发现和诊断。过度依赖被动病例发现、症状筛查和痰液采集,会导致结核病诊断延迟或漏诊,这直接助长了结核病的持续传播。我们评估了在家庭接触者调查(HCI)期间,使用GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra在护理点(POC)对家庭接触者进行居家针对性普遍结核病检测(TUTT)的可接受性和可行性,并比较了使用痰液与舌拭子标本的可行性。
作为结核病家庭研究的一部分,接受居家POC TUTT的家庭接触者(HHC)被要求完成一项检测后可接受性调查。该调查探讨了HHC的舒适度、对检测结果的信心以及对居家POC TUTT的感知适宜性。我们使用快速护理点技术可行性评估指标框架来评估使用痰液和舌拭子标本进行居家POC TUTT的可行性。描述性统计用于报告参与者的回答和可行性指标。
在313名符合条件的HHC中,267/313(85.3%)同意进行居家POC TUTT。其中,267/267(100%)提供了舌拭子,46/267(17.2%)能够咳出痰液。所有标本均成功制备,可立即在GeneXpert Edge上使用Xpert Ultra进行居家检测。在进行的164次舌拭子检测中,160/164(97.6%)产生了有效的检测结果,而基于痰液的检测为44/46(95.7%)。基于居家拭子检测,262/267(98.1%)的个体可获得即时检测结果,基于居家痰液检测的为44/46(95.7%)。居家POC TUTT的平均可接受性评分(5分=高度可接受)为4.5/5(标准差=0.2)。
使用痰液或舌拭子标本进行居家POC TUTT是高度可接受且可行的。与痰液相比,舌拭子标本大大提高了接受检测的HHC比例。结合使用痰液和舌拭子进行居家POC TUTT可以弥补病例发现方面的不足。