Legelli Mo, Froning Matti, Wirtz Michaela, Lamotte Stefan
Department of Natural Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Von-Liebig-Str. 20, 53359, Rheinbach, Germany.
Department of Analytical and Material Science, BASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Str. 38, 67056, Ludwigshafen Am Rhein, Germany.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025 Jan;417(2):323-333. doi: 10.1007/s00216-024-05647-5. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
The analysis of polar analytes with the help of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) using classic methods of high-performance liquid chromatography is not without its downsides. In these applications, acetonitrile is prevalent as main eluent and sample diluent. This results not only in slow diffusion processes during the separation, but also in often unstable sample solutions where polar analytes are concerned. Furthermore, there are ecological concerns. With the use of supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) which uses supercritical carbon dioxide as eluent, and other green solvents as alternative for the sample preparation, the separation of polar analytes could be vastly improved with this technique. Fast diffusion within carbon dioxide led to shorter analysis times and higher plate numbers. Regarding sample diluents, small alcohols such as ethanol and 2-propanol, as well as acetone, yielded promising results while analytes showed higher solubility and stability within these solvents compared to acetonitrile. Other green solvents such as dihydrolevoglucosenone (Cyrene) and dimethyl carbonate were found to be unsuitable sample diluents for applications in SFC.
借助高效液相色谱的经典方法,采用亲水作用液相色谱(HILIC)对极性分析物进行分析并非没有缺点。在这些应用中,乙腈作为主要洗脱剂和样品稀释剂很常见。这不仅导致分离过程中扩散缓慢,而且对于极性分析物而言,样品溶液往往不稳定。此外,还有生态方面的问题。使用以超临界二氧化碳为洗脱剂的超临界流体色谱(SFC)以及其他绿色溶剂作为样品制备的替代品,该技术可极大地改善极性分析物的分离。二氧化碳内的快速扩散导致分析时间缩短和塔板数增加。关于样品稀释剂,乙醇和2-丙醇等小醇类以及丙酮取得了良好结果,与乙腈相比,分析物在这些溶剂中的溶解度和稳定性更高。其他绿色溶剂,如二氢左旋葡萄糖酮(赛伦)和碳酸二甲酯,被发现不适用于SFC中的样品稀释剂。