• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多变量预测模型用于轻度认知障碍和痴呆症:算法开发和验证。

A Multivariable Prediction Model for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Algorithm Development and Validation.

机构信息

Institute of Global Engagement & Empowerment, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Nursing, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 22;12:e59396. doi: 10.2196/59396.

DOI:10.2196/59396
PMID:39576972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11624448/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) poses significant challenges in early diagnosis and timely intervention. Underdiagnosis, coupled with the economic and social burden of dementia, necessitates more precise detection methods. Machine learning (ML) algorithms show promise in managing complex data for MCI and dementia prediction.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the predictive accuracy of ML models in identifying the onset of MCI and dementia using the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA) dataset.

METHODS

This study used data from the KLoSA, a comprehensive biennial survey that tracks the demographic, health, and socioeconomic aspects of middle-aged and older Korean adults from 2018 to 2020. Among the 6171 initial households, 4975 eligible older adult participants aged 60 years or older were selected after excluding individuals based on age and missing data. The identification of MCI and dementia relied on self-reported diagnoses, with sociodemographic and health-related variables serving as key covariates. The dataset was categorized into training and test sets to predict MCI and dementia by using multiple models, including logistic regression, light gradient-boosting machine, XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting), CatBoost, random forest, gradient boosting, AdaBoost, support vector classifier, and k-nearest neighbors, and the training and test sets were used to evaluate predictive performance. The performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Class imbalances were addressed via weights. Shapley additive explanation values were used to determine the contribution of each feature to the prediction rate.

RESULTS

Among the 4975 participants, the best model for predicting MCI onset was random forest, with a median AUC of 0.6729 (IQR 0.3883-0.8152), followed by k-nearest neighbors with a median AUC of 0.5576 (IQR 0.4555-0.6761) and support vector classifier with a median AUC of 0.5067 (IQR 0.3755-0.6389). For dementia onset prediction, the best model was XGBoost, achieving a median AUC of 0.8185 (IQR 0.8085-0.8285), closely followed by light gradient-boosting machine with a median AUC of 0.8069 (IQR 0.7969-0.8169) and AdaBoost with a median AUC of 0.8007 (IQR 0.7907-0.8107). The Shapley values highlighted pain in everyday life, being widowed, living alone, exercising, and living with a partner as the strongest predictors of MCI. For dementia, the most predictive features were other contributing factors, education at the high school level, education at the middle school level, exercising, and monthly social engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

ML algorithms, especially XGBoost, exhibited the potential for predicting MCI onset using KLoSA data. However, no model has demonstrated robust accuracy in predicting MCI and dementia. Sociodemographic and health-related factors are crucial for initiating cognitive conditions, emphasizing the need for multifaceted predictive models for early identification and intervention. These findings underscore the potential and limitations of ML in predicting cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6a4/11624448/23c87bcb4b3f/medinform_v12i1e59396_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6a4/11624448/23c87bcb4b3f/medinform_v12i1e59396_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6a4/11624448/23c87bcb4b3f/medinform_v12i1e59396_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

轻度认知障碍(MCI)在早期诊断和及时干预方面带来了重大挑战。由于漏诊以及痴呆症的经济和社会负担,我们需要更精确的检测方法。机器学习(ML)算法在管理 MCI 和痴呆症预测的复杂数据方面显示出了潜力。

目的

本研究评估了使用韩国老龄化纵向研究(KLoSA)数据集的 ML 模型在识别 MCI 和痴呆症发病方面的预测准确性。

方法

本研究使用了 KLoSA 的数据,这是一项对中年及以上韩国成年人进行的全面两年一次的调查,从 2018 年到 2020 年跟踪他们的人口统计学、健康和社会经济方面。在最初的 6171 个家庭中,选择了 4975 名符合条件的 60 岁及以上的老年参与者,这些参与者是在根据年龄和缺失数据排除了一些人之后选择的。MCI 和痴呆症的识别依赖于自我报告的诊断,社会人口统计学和与健康相关的变量是关键的协变量。该数据集被分为训练集和测试集,通过使用多种模型,包括逻辑回归、轻梯度提升机、XGBoost(极端梯度提升)、CatBoost、随机森林、梯度提升、AdaBoost、支持向量分类器和 K-最近邻,来预测 MCI 和痴呆症,然后使用训练集和测试集来评估预测性能。使用接收器操作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)来评估性能。通过权重来解决类别不平衡问题。Shapley 加性解释值用于确定每个特征对预测率的贡献。

结果

在 4975 名参与者中,预测 MCI 发病的最佳模型是随机森林,其中位数 AUC 为 0.6729(IQR 0.3883-0.8152),其次是 K-最近邻,中位数 AUC 为 0.5576(IQR 0.4555-0.6761)和支持向量分类器,中位数 AUC 为 0.5067(IQR 0.3755-0.6389)。对于痴呆症发病预测,最佳模型是 XGBoost,其中位数 AUC 为 0.8185(IQR 0.8085-0.8285),紧随其后的是轻梯度提升机,中位数 AUC 为 0.8069(IQR 0.7969-0.8169)和 AdaBoost,中位数 AUC 为 0.8007(IQR 0.7907-0.8107)。Shapley 值突出了日常生活中的疼痛、丧偶、独居、锻炼和与伴侣生活是 MCI 的最强预测因素。对于痴呆症,最具预测性的特征是其他促成因素、高中教育、中学教育、锻炼和每月的社交参与。

结论

ML 算法,特别是 XGBoost,在使用 KLoSA 数据预测 MCI 发病方面显示出了潜力。然而,没有一种模型在预测 MCI 和痴呆症方面表现出稳健的准确性。社会人口统计学和与健康相关的因素对认知状况的发生至关重要,这强调了需要针对早期识别和干预的多方面预测模型。这些发现突出了 ML 在预测社区居住的老年人群体认知障碍方面的潜力和局限性。

相似文献

1
A Multivariable Prediction Model for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Algorithm Development and Validation.多变量预测模型用于轻度认知障碍和痴呆症:算法开发和验证。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 22;12:e59396. doi: 10.2196/59396.
2
Prediction and validation of mild cognitive impairment in occupational dust exposure population based on machine learning.基于机器学习的职业性粉尘暴露人群轻度认知功能障碍的预测和验证。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024 Oct 15;285:117111. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117111. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
3
Cognitive performance classification of older patients using machine learning and electronic medical records.使用机器学习和电子病历对老年患者进行认知表现分类
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 24;15(1):6564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90460-y.
4
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
5
Prediction of Cognitive Impairment Risk among Older Adults: A Machine Learning-Based Comparative Study and Model Development.预测老年人认知障碍风险:基于机器学习的对比研究与模型构建。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2024;53(4):169-179. doi: 10.1159/000539334. Epub 2024 May 22.
6
AI Machine Learning-Based Diabetes Prediction in Older Adults in South Korea: Cross-Sectional Analysis.基于人工智能机器学习的韩国老年人糖尿病预测:横断面分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 21;9:e57874. doi: 10.2196/57874.
7
Detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults using naturalistic driving data and interaction-based classification from influence score.利用自然驾驶数据和基于影响得分的交互分类来检测老年人的轻度认知障碍和痴呆症。
Artif Intell Med. 2023 Apr;138:102510. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102510. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
8
Identifying Predictive Risk Factors for Future Cognitive Impairment Among Chinese Older Adults: Longitudinal Prediction Study.识别中国老年人未来认知障碍的预测风险因素:纵向预测研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Mar 22;7:e53240. doi: 10.2196/53240.
9
A Stable and Scalable Digital Composite Neurocognitive Test for Early Dementia Screening Based on Machine Learning: Model Development and Validation Study.基于机器学习的稳定且可扩展的数字化复合神经认知测试在早期痴呆筛查中的应用:模型的开发与验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 1;25:e49147. doi: 10.2196/49147.
10
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model-Predicting mild cognitive impairment in a high-risk stroke population.一种可解释的机器学习模型的开发与验证——预测高危中风人群中的轻度认知障碍
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Jun 15;15:1180351. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1180351. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced Multi-Model Machine Learning-Based Dementia Detection Using a Data Enrichment Framework: Leveraging the Blessing of Dimensionality.使用数据丰富框架的基于增强多模型机器学习的痴呆症检测:利用维度的优势
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 30;12(6):592. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060592.

本文引用的文献

1
Burden of Illness in People with Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology, Comorbidities and Mortality.阿尔茨海默病患者的疾病负担:流行病学、合并症和死亡率的系统评价。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(1):97-107. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2023.61.
2
Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.人工智能在预防痴呆中的应用。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Dec;19(12):5952-5969. doi: 10.1002/alz.13463. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
3
Sociodemographic Factors Predict Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Brief Review and Empirical Study.
社会人口因素预测轻度认知障碍的发生:简要综述和实证研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Dec;24(12):1959-1966.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
South Korea's population shift: challenges and opportunities.韩国的人口迁移:挑战与机遇。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Jul 31;36:100865. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100865. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
The impact of loneliness and social isolation on the development of cognitive decline and Alzheimer's Disease.孤独和社会隔离对认知能力下降和阿尔茨海默病发展的影响。
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2023 Apr;69:101061. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2023.101061. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
Socioeconomic Status and Risks of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 39 Prospective Studies.社会经济地位与认知障碍和痴呆风险:39 项前瞻性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(1):83-94. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2022.81.
7
Dementia risk prediction in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a comparison of Cox regression and machine learning models.轻度认知障碍个体的痴呆风险预测:Cox 回归和机器学习模型的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 2;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01754-y.
8
Association between social integration and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.社会融合与痴呆症风险之间的关联:纵向研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Feb;71(2):632-645. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18094. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
9
Estimating the Prevalence of Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in the US: The 2016 Health and Retirement Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol Project.估算美国痴呆症和轻度认知障碍的患病率:2016 年健康退休研究协调认知评估方案项目。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Dec 1;79(12):1242-1249. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3543.
10
Patterns and risk factors of cognitive decline among community-dwelling older adults in South Korea.韩国社区居住的老年人认知能力下降的模式和风险因素。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jan;104:104809. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104809. Epub 2022 Sep 8.