• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的三联疗法与根治性膀胱切除术:配对队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

Trimodality Therapy Versus Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Matched Cohort Studies.

作者信息

Matsukawa Akihiro, Yanagisawa Takafumi, Miszczyk Marcin, Kardoust Parizi Mehdi, Fazekas Tamás, Tsuboi Ichiro, Mancon Stefano, Klemm Jakob, Schulz Robert, Cadenar Anna, Laukhtina Ekaterina, Rajwa Paweł, Mori Keiichiro, Miki Jun, Kimura Takahiro, Shariat Shahrokh F

机构信息

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland.

出版信息

Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Nov 21. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.003
PMID:39578213
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). It is highly invasive and associated with perioperative risks, while bladder-preserving trimodality therapy (TMT) offers a less invasive alternative with preferable quality of life for selected patients. We aimed to compare oncological outcomes of TMT and RC in MIBC patients, and evaluate TMT-specific outcomes.

METHODS

In December 2023, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies on MIBC patients treated with TMT. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between MIBC patients treated with TMT and RC, utilizing hazard ratios (HRs). We included only matched cohort studies to minimize selection bias. TMT-specific outcomes, such as response, recurrence, and toxicity rates, were pooled separately.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Eighty-seven studies (n = 28 218) were identified. No significant differences in OS (HR: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.40) and CSS (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.58) were found for TMT compared with RC. In patients treated with TMT, the complete response was achieved in 74.4% (95% CI: 69.1-79.1), the estimated rate of intravesical recurrence was 23.1% (95% CI: 19.0-27.7), and the rate of grade ≥3 acute toxicity was 11.4% (95% CI: 4.0-28.4).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The oncological outcomes of TMT were comparable with those of RC, with an acceptable toxicity profile. TMT appears as a safe and effective treatment for appropriately selected MIBC patients who want to preserve their bladder. However, evidence from high-volume controlled trials is needed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Well-selected patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be treated with "trimodality therapy" to preserve the bladder. So far, the reported outcomes are comparable with those of radical surgery, and we found no signs of excess toxicity.

摘要

背景与目的

根治性膀胱切除术(RC)是肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的标准治疗方法。该手术具有高度侵入性且伴有围手术期风险,而保膀胱三联疗法(TMT)为部分患者提供了侵入性较小且生活质量更佳的替代方案。我们旨在比较MIBC患者接受TMT和RC后的肿瘤学结局,并评估TMT特有的结局。

方法

2023年12月,检索了PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中关于接受TMT治疗的MIBC患者的研究。采用危险比(HR)进行成对荟萃分析,比较接受TMT和RC治疗的MIBC患者的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。我们仅纳入匹配队列研究以尽量减少选择偏倚。分别汇总TMT特有的结局,如缓解率、复发率和毒性率。

主要发现与局限性

共识别出87项研究(n = 28218)。与RC相比,TMT在OS(HR:1.05;95%置信区间[CI]:0.78 - 1.40)和CSS(HR:1.05;95% CI:0.69 - 1.58)方面无显著差异。接受TMT治疗的患者中,完全缓解率为74.4%(95% CI:69.1 - 79.1),膀胱内复发估计率为23.1%(95% CI:19.0 - 27.7),≥3级急性毒性率为11.4%(95% CI:4.0 - 28.4)。

结论与临床意义

TMT的肿瘤学结局与RC相当,毒性特征可接受。对于希望保留膀胱的合适MIBC患者,TMT似乎是一种安全有效的治疗方法。然而,仍需要来自大规模对照试验的证据。

患者总结

精心挑选的非转移性肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者可采用“三联疗法”保留膀胱。到目前为止,报告的结局与根治性手术相当,且我们未发现过度毒性的迹象。

相似文献

1
Trimodality Therapy Versus Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Matched Cohort Studies.肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的三联疗法与根治性膀胱切除术:配对队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Nov 21. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.003.
2
Radical cystectomy versus organ-sparing trimodality treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review of clinical trials.根治性膀胱切除术与肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的保留器官三联疗法:一项临床试验的系统评价
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Sep;95(3):387-96. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
3
Comparing Long-Term Survival Outcomes for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Who Underwent with Radical Cystectomy and Bladder-Sparing Trimodality Therapy: A Multicentre Cohort Analysis.比较接受根治性膀胱切除术和膀胱保留三联疗法的肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的长期生存结果:一项多中心队列分析。
J Oncol. 2022 May 14;2022:7306198. doi: 10.1155/2022/7306198. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of Immune and Stromal Infiltration on Outcomes Following Bladder-Sparing Trimodality Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.免疫和基质浸润对肌层浸润性膀胱癌保膀胱三联疗法后结局的影响。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
5
Comparison of trimodality therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy for the survival of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a population-based analysis.三联疗法与新辅助化疗联合根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的生存比较:基于人群的分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Oct 11;28(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01408-9.
6
Oncological effectiveness of bladder-preserving trimodal therapy versus radical cystectomy for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a system review and meta-analysis.保膀胱的三联疗法与根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的肿瘤学疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug 29;21(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03161-z.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the oncological long-term outcomes after trimodality therapy and radical cystectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.一项关于肌肉浸润性膀胱癌接受三联疗法以及接受或不接受新辅助化疗的根治性膀胱切除术后肿瘤学长期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Feb;36(2):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
Predictors of trimodality therapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and effect on survival.肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者三联疗法的预测因素及其对生存的影响。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Feb;26(2):446-455. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03264-9. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
9
Trimodal Therapy vs. Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的三联疗法与根治性膀胱切除术:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 14;10:564779. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.564779. eCollection 2020.
10
Trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.多模式治疗与根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2024 Nov;134(5):684-695. doi: 10.1111/bju.16366. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Disitamab vedotin combined with toripalimab and radiotherapy for multimodal organ-sparing treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer: a proof-of-concept study.迪西他单抗维莫非尼联合托瑞帕利单抗及放疗用于肌肉浸润性膀胱癌多模式器官保留治疗:一项概念验证研究
Neoplasia. 2025 Aug 6;68:101216. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2025.101216.
2
Development and validation of interpretable machine learning models to predict distant metastasis and prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients.用于预测肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者远处转移和预后的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 6;15(1):11795. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96089-1.
3
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis of Eligibility, Utilization, and Outcomes.
肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的新辅助化疗:一项关于资格、应用情况及治疗结果的全国性分析。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 3;17(3):505. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030505.